Thanks! (I would have done it in Basic, certainly not as condensed...)UncombedCoconut wrote:No job is too tedious for Perl.
But now, what's the best/simplest way to run that Perl script?
(I know, I can google, but perhaps you can say something )
Thanks! (I would have done it in Basic, certainly not as condensed...)UncombedCoconut wrote:No job is too tedious for Perl.
Hi Martin,Martin Thoresen wrote:2: Yes, I am using ChessGUI's own PGN format
I see you changed the format to suit Fritz GUI to get evals right in the graph.
I can't use Chessbase format because I use many sets of comments that is not a part of the Chessbase PGN standard.ernest wrote: Hi Martin,
Can you have a look at
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 436#392436,
and Matthias's answer?
Then why don't you set ChessGUI's PGNs so that they are readable, with Evaluation Profile, in the Fritz GUI?
Thanks!
If I mess up the format of ChessBase, they can jail meMartin Thoresen wrote:I can't use Chessbase format because I use many sets of comments that is not a part of the Chessbase PGN standard.ernest wrote: Hi Martin,
Can you have a look at
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 436#392436,
and Matthias's answer?
Then why don't you set ChessGUI's PGNs so that they are readable, with Evaluation Profile, in the Fritz GUI?
Thanks!
Pal Larkin is only using 3 set of comments in the PGN:
22.Ne5 {[%eval 69,20] [%emt 00:01:46] [%clk 0:48:27]}
(eval - move time - clock)
While I am using:
11.d4 { ev=0.11, d=23, pd=cxd3, mt=00:07:34, tl=02:22:25, s=600 kN/s, pv=d2d4 c4d3 c2d3 e5e2 e1e2 h7h6 g5f3 e6e5 b1d2, tb=0, R50=50, }
(eval - depth - ponder move - move time - clock - speed - pv - tablebase hits - distance to 50-move rule)
Many of the comments that I use does not exist in Chessbase format.
Matthias can probably elaborate further, but I remember discussing this with him during the start of TCEC a while ago.
Best,
Martin
Hi Martin,Martin Thoresen wrote: I can't use Chessbase format because I use many sets of comments that is not a part of the Chessbase PGN standard.
Pal Larkin is only using 3 set of comments in the PGN:
22.Ne5 {[%eval 69,20] [%emt 00:01:46] [%clk 0:48:27]}
(eval - move time - clock)
While I am using:
11.d4 { ev=0.11, d=23, pd=cxd3, mt=00:07:34, tl=02:22:25, s=600 kN/s, pv=d2d4 c4d3 c2d3 e5e2 e1e2 h7h6 g5f3 e6e5 b1d2, tb=0, R50=50, }
(eval - depth - ponder move - move time - clock - speed - pv - tablebase hits - distance to 50-move rule)
Many of the comments that I use does not exist in Chessbase format.
Matthias can probably elaborate further, but I remember discussing this with him during the start of TCEC a while ago.
Best,
Martin
Carsten,CarstenL wrote: Hi Martin,
why so many comments necessary ?
what is the sense ?
I would also prefer you do just as Pal Larkin does.
Thanks
Hi Matthias,Matthias Gemuh wrote:If I mess up the format of ChessBase, they can jail me Matthias.
Ernest, I'm sorry that I missed your question. I have not used Perl on Windows for many years, but the easiest way might be:ernest wrote:Thanks! (I would have done it in Basic, certainly not as condensed...)UncombedCoconut wrote:No job is too tedious for Perl.
But now, what's the best/simplest way to run that Perl script?
(I know, I can google, but perhaps you can say something )