Deep Junior 12 UCI

Discussion about chess-playing software (engines, hosts, opening books, platforms, etc...)
User avatar
thorstenczub
Posts: 593
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:51 pm
Real Name: Thorsten Czub
Location: United States of Europe, germany, NRW, Lünen
Contact:

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by thorstenczub » Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:18 pm

junior is maybe interesting for people who have anything.
but it is not even a top 10 program . same as junior 11.

if somebody likes it.... ok.

but its not SUCH a big star anymore.

Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:23 pm

Parrot is dead ! :lol:

Next example!

This game is in progress on playchess:

[Event "120m, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2010.10.29"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Nebula, Deep Rybka 4 SSE42 x"]
[Black "Romanzev, Deep Junior 12 UCI"]
[Result "*"]
[WhiteElo "2622"]
[BlackElo "2482"]
[PlyCount "122"]
[EventDate "2010.10.29"]

1. e4 {B/0 0} e6 {B/0 0} 2. d4 {B/0 0} d5 {B/0 0} 3. Nc3 {B/0 0} Bb4 {B/0 0} 4.
e5 {B/0 0} c5 {B/0 0} 5. Bd2 {B/0 0} Ne7 {B/0 0} 6. a3 {B/0 0} Bxc3 {B/0 0} 7.
Bxc3 {B/0 0} b6 {B/0 0} 8. b4 {B/0 0} Qc7 {B/0 0} 9. Nf3 {B/0 0} cxb4 {
0.06/22 166} 10. Bxb4 {B/0 0} a5 {0.04/24 181} 11. Bd2 {0.01/25 338} Ba6 {
(0-0) 0.06/25 280} 12. Bxa6 {0.00/24 792} Nxa6 {(Rxa6) 0.07/24 0} 13. O-O {
0.06/24 706} O-O {(Rc8) 0.12/26 0} 14. Rb1 {0.04/23 306} Rfb8 {
(Rac8) 0.05/21 82} 15. Rb5 {0.05/23 317} h6 {(Qc4) 0.00/22 144} 16. Rb3 {
0.00/22 669} Ng6 {(Rc8) 0.04/21 233} 17. Qc1 {0.10/23 362} Qc8 {
(Rb7) 0.23/21 186} 18. Bxh6 {0.51/22 351} a4 {0.45/24 153} 19. Rd3 {0.46/23 0}
gxh6 {0.31/23 242} 20. Qxh6 {0.46/22 0} Qf8 {0.71/24 310} 21. Qd2 {0.54/23 0}
b5 {0.64/23 226} 22. h4 {0.31/22 0} Ra7 {0.73/23 557} 23. Ng5 {0.59/21 0} Qh6 {
(Rc7) 0.93/23 1054} 24. h5 {0.60/20 73} Nh4 {(Ne7) 1.00/22 218} 25. g4 {
0.54/20 265} b4 {0.65/22 258} 26. f4 {0.54/19 0} f6 {(bxa3) 0.74/21 214} 27.
exf6 {0.67/17 83} Qxf6 {0.65/20 114} 28. Kh2 {0.68/18 146} Rg7 {0.77/20 114}
29. Qe1 {0.76/19 4} b3 {0.62/20 74} 30. cxb3 {0.77/21 0} axb3 {0.68/19 67} 31.
Qxe6+ {0.87/21 0} Qxe6 {0.41/23 47} 32. Nxe6 {0.87/22 0} Re7 {
(Rxg4) 0.45/24 130} 33. f5 {1.08/21 33} b2 {(Nc7) 0.33/23 38} 34. Rb1 {
1.08/22 76} Nc7 {0.33/22 69} 35. Re3 {0.98/23 2} Rf8 {0.16/23 86} 36. Rxb2 {
0.98/22 0} Nxe6 {0.20/22 46} 37. Rxe6 {0.97/23 139} Rxe6 {(Nf3+) 0.15/22 72}
38. fxe6 {0.98/22 26} Nf3+ {0.29/22 58} 39. Kg3 {0.68/23 0} Nxd4 {0.31/22 55}
40. e7 {0.68/23 58} Re8 {(Ra8) 0.30/23 25} 41. Rd2 {1.29/24 91} Nc6 {0.24/23 94
} 42. Rxd5 {1.15/27 0} Rxe7 {0.23/22 85} 43. Rc5 {1.01/26 152} Nd4 {0.23/23 0}
44. Ra5 {1.01/26 162} Rc7 {(Re4) 0.21/22 167} 45. a4 {1.01/25 256} Rc3+ {
(Kh7) 0.19/23 0} 46. Kf4 {0.67/25 134} Rc4 {0.18/22 52} 47. Ra6 {0.67/25 6} Kh7
{0.17/21 31} 48. Ra8 {0.37/25 13} Ne6+ {(Kh6) 0.10/20 25} 49. Kf5 {0.23/26 84}
Ng7+ {(Nd4+) 0.03/21 24} 50. Kg5 {0.23/26 55} Rc5+ {(Ne6+) 0.00/22 0} 51. Kh4 {
0.08/26 74} Nxh5 {(Rc4) 0.00/26 28} 52. gxh5 {4.10/21 7} Kg7 {(Rc4+) 0} 53. a5
{4.65/32 75} Kh6 {0} 54. Kg3 {4.65/33 36} Kg7 {(Kh7) 0} 55. Kg4 {4.65/34 86}
Rc4+ {0} 56. Kf3 {4.65/31 6} Rc5 {(Rc3+) 0} 57. Ra7+ {4.65/33 5} Kh6 {(Kh8) 0}
58. Ra6+ {4.65/36 106} Kh7 {0} 59. Kg4 {4.65/36 42} Rc4+ {0} 60. Kg5 {
4.65/36 32} Rc5+ {0} 61. Kh4 {4.65/36 36} Rf5 {(Rb5) 0} *

Deep Rybka 4 is here +4.65 :lol: , but game will be draw!

Current position:

8/7k/R7/P4r1P/7K/8/8/8 w - - 0 1

6 men tb:

62.h6
= (0.00) Tiefe: 53 00:00:00 0kN, tb=720

ED.
Peace be with you!

User avatar
thorstenczub
Posts: 593
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:51 pm
Real Name: Thorsten Czub
Location: United States of Europe, germany, NRW, Lünen
Contact:

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by thorstenczub » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:13 pm

eduard, fuege die Partie doch in PGN ein, dann kann man sie direkt nachspielen und braucht nicht noch ein schachprogramm dafuer.

[Event "120m, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2010.10.29"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Nebula, Deep Rybka 4 SSE42 x"]
[Black "Romanzev, Deep Junior 12 UCI"]
[Result "*"]
[WhiteElo "2622"]
[BlackElo "2482"]
[PlyCount "122"]
[EventDate "2010.10.29"]

1. e4 {B/0 0} e6 {B/0 0} 2. d4 {B/0 0} d5 {B/0 0} 3. Nc3 {B/0 0} Bb4 {B/0 0} 4.
e5 {B/0 0} c5 {B/0 0} 5. Bd2 {B/0 0} Ne7 {B/0 0} 6. a3 {B/0 0} Bxc3 {B/0 0} 7.
Bxc3 {B/0 0} b6 {B/0 0} 8. b4 {B/0 0} Qc7 {B/0 0} 9. Nf3 {B/0 0} cxb4 {
0.06/22 166} 10. Bxb4 {B/0 0} a5 {0.04/24 181} 11. Bd2 {0.01/25 338} Ba6 {
(0-0) 0.06/25 280} 12. Bxa6 {0.00/24 792} Nxa6 {(Rxa6) 0.07/24 0} 13. O-O {
0.06/24 706} O-O {(Rc8) 0.12/26 0} 14. Rb1 {0.04/23 306} Rfb8 {
(Rac8) 0.05/21 82} 15. Rb5 {0.05/23 317} h6 {(Qc4) 0.00/22 144} 16. Rb3 {
0.00/22 669} Ng6 {(Rc8) 0.04/21 233} 17. Qc1 {0.10/23 362} Qc8 {
(Rb7) 0.23/21 186} 18. Bxh6 {0.51/22 351} a4 {0.45/24 153} 19. Rd3 {0.46/23 0}
gxh6 {0.31/23 242} 20. Qxh6 {0.46/22 0} Qf8 {0.71/24 310} 21. Qd2 {0.54/23 0}
b5 {0.64/23 226} 22. h4 {0.31/22 0} Ra7 {0.73/23 557} 23. Ng5 {0.59/21 0} Qh6 {
(Rc7) 0.93/23 1054} 24. h5 {0.60/20 73} Nh4 {(Ne7) 1.00/22 218} 25. g4 {
0.54/20 265} b4 {0.65/22 258} 26. f4 {0.54/19 0} f6 {(bxa3) 0.74/21 214} 27.
exf6 {0.67/17 83} Qxf6 {0.65/20 114} 28. Kh2 {0.68/18 146} Rg7 {0.77/20 114}
29. Qe1 {0.76/19 4} b3 {0.62/20 74} 30. cxb3 {0.77/21 0} axb3 {0.68/19 67} 31.
Qxe6+ {0.87/21 0} Qxe6 {0.41/23 47} 32. Nxe6 {0.87/22 0} Re7 {
(Rxg4) 0.45/24 130} 33. f5 {1.08/21 33} b2 {(Nc7) 0.33/23 38} 34. Rb1 {
1.08/22 76} Nc7 {0.33/22 69} 35. Re3 {0.98/23 2} Rf8 {0.16/23 86} 36. Rxb2 {
0.98/22 0} Nxe6 {0.20/22 46} 37. Rxe6 {0.97/23 139} Rxe6 {(Nf3+) 0.15/22 72}
38. fxe6 {0.98/22 26} Nf3+ {0.29/22 58} 39. Kg3 {0.68/23 0} Nxd4 {0.31/22 55}
40. e7 {0.68/23 58} Re8 {(Ra8) 0.30/23 25} 41. Rd2 {1.29/24 91} Nc6 {0.24/23 94
} 42. Rxd5 {1.15/27 0} Rxe7 {0.23/22 85} 43. Rc5 {1.01/26 152} Nd4 {0.23/23 0}
44. Ra5 {1.01/26 162} Rc7 {(Re4) 0.21/22 167} 45. a4 {1.01/25 256} Rc3+ {
(Kh7) 0.19/23 0} 46. Kf4 {0.67/25 134} Rc4 {0.18/22 52} 47. Ra6 {0.67/25 6} Kh7
{0.17/21 31} 48. Ra8 {0.37/25 13} Ne6+ {(Kh6) 0.10/20 25} 49. Kf5 {0.23/26 84}
Ng7+ {(Nd4+) 0.03/21 24} 50. Kg5 {0.23/26 55} Rc5+ {(Ne6+) 0.00/22 0} 51. Kh4 {
0.08/26 74} Nxh5 {(Rc4) 0.00/26 28} 52. gxh5 {4.10/21 7} Kg7 {(Rc4+) 0} 53. a5
{4.65/32 75} Kh6 {0} 54. Kg3 {4.65/33 36} Kg7 {(Kh7) 0} 55. Kg4 {4.65/34 86}
Rc4+ {0} 56. Kf3 {4.65/31 6} Rc5 {(Rc3+) 0} 57. Ra7+ {4.65/33 5} Kh6 {(Kh8) 0}
58. Ra6+ {4.65/36 106} Kh7 {0} 59. Kg4 {4.65/36 42} Rc4+ {0} 60. Kg5 {
4.65/36 32} Rc5+ {0} 61. Kh4 {4.65/36 36} Rf5 {(Rb5) 0} *

User avatar
robbolito
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:48 am

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by robbolito » Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:59 pm

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz 8.0 GB Memory
Windows 7 Home Premium Edition (Build 7600) 64 bit
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 13.09
KNS: 6280
GUI: Rybka 3
Book: Masterbook 4-10 moves
Hash:256
TB and GTB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz: 10.0

Code: Select all

1   RobboLito 0.09 x64  3190  +15/-5/=10 66.67%   20.0/30
2   Deep Junior 12 UCI  3190  +5/-15/=10 33.33%   10.0/30

                            

AnthonyTheSage
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:31 am
Real Name: Anthony

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by AnthonyTheSage » Fri Jan 21, 2011 3:12 pm

I'd say Deep Junior 12 is a must have for any serious chess player. Free engines that play like rybka are a dime a dozen. Junior has a unique attacking style that is great for analysis. Junior will quickly show you how to rip apart the enemy king position. As for strength, considering the older version drew against Kasparov and this version is stronger, I'd say it's plenty strong enough.

John Doe
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:24 pm

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by John Doe » Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:36 pm

AnthonyTheSage wrote:I'd say Deep Junior 12 is a must have for any serious chess player. Free engines that play like rybka are a dime a dozen. Junior has a unique attacking style that is great for analysis. Junior will quickly show you how to rip apart the enemy king position. As for strength, considering the older version drew against Kasparov and this version is stronger, I'd say it's plenty strong enough.
Junior - is a cr*ppy piece of s*it. If you want «to rip apart the enemy king position» use Critter or Spark. Thet both a free and much more stronger in tactics

AnthonyTheSage
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:31 am
Real Name: Anthony

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by AnthonyTheSage » Sat Jan 22, 2011 3:04 am

Thats really quite funny, when the fact is Junior would wipe the board with you any day of the week.

John Doe
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:24 pm

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by John Doe » Sat Jan 22, 2011 4:27 pm

AnthonyTheSage wrote:Thats really quite funny, when the fact is Junior would wipe the board with you any day of the week.
Thats really more funny, when the fact is Critter would wipe the board with Junior any day of the week
And it's free :arrow:

Jeremy Bernstein
Site Admin
Posts: 1226
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:49 am
Real Name: Jeremy Bernstein
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by Jeremy Bernstein » Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:35 pm

John Doe wrote:
AnthonyTheSage wrote:Thats really quite funny, when the fact is Junior would wipe the board with you any day of the week.
Thats really more funny, when the fact is Critter would wipe the board with Junior any day of the week
And it's free :arrow:
That may all be so, but Junior is generally credited as having great playing style, even if it's not as strong as Critter, Houdini, Rybka, etc. I don't have it, so I can't say for sure, but there is more to life than ELO strength. When I'm analyzing human games, I want analysis that's human-like, rather than computer-like, because I play like a human and so do my opponents. So, so what if Junior loses to Critter? Will it help me understand my games better than Critter?

Jeremy

tomgdrums
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:23 am

Re: Deep Junior 12 UCI

Post by tomgdrums » Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:56 am

Jeremy Bernstein wrote:
John Doe wrote:
AnthonyTheSage wrote:Thats really quite funny, when the fact is Junior would wipe the board with you any day of the week.
Thats really more funny, when the fact is Critter would wipe the board with Junior any day of the week
And it's free :arrow:
That may all be so, but Junior is generally credited as having great playing style, even if it's not as strong as Critter, Houdini, Rybka, etc. I don't have it, so I can't say for sure, but there is more to life than ELO strength. When I'm analyzing human games, I want analysis that's human-like, rather than computer-like, because I play like a human and so do my opponents. So, so what if Junior loses to Critter? Will it help me understand my games better than Critter?

Jeremy
Very true Jeremy!!

ELO isn't everything! Too many people who follow computer chess seem to forget that people use engines for various purposes. Junior actually serves MY purposes better than Critter so I don't mind paying for Junjor. And that is NOT a knock on Critter! Critter serves other people's purposes better than Junior might. I don't know why everyone has to feel like their "team" is better than the others.

Free vs. commercial is such a silly argument. There are some great commercial and some great free engines. Why does it have to be such a battleground???

Post Reply