Houdini 1.5 Tests

[karakaniec]

Chess liga (Houdini 1.5 win):
http://szachmaty.blogspot.com/2010/12/j ... ja-22.html

[kingliveson]

20101230_ho_iv_ry_1m  2010 
                                                                            
1   Houdini 1.5 x64         *********** 56.0 - 44.0 64.5 - 35.5 120.5/200
2   Deep Rybka 4 SSE42 x64  44.0 - 56.0 *********** 48.0 - 52.0 92.0/200
3   IvanHoe 9.47b x64       35.5 - 64.5 52.0 - 48.0 *********** 87.5/200

† 50 Positions (test suite)
† EGTB Off
† Ponder Off
† 128 MB Hash
† Phenom II 940
† 4 Cores
† 1+0 Time Control


Game data available: http://chess.cygnitec.com/pgn/

[robbolito]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz 8.0 GB Memory
Windows 7 Home Premium Edition (Build 7600) 64 bit
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 13.09
KNS: 6280
GUI: Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009-10 moves
Hash:256
TB and GTB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz: 10.0

Code: Select all

1   Houdini 1.5 x64   3190  +15/-10/=25 55.00%   27.5/50
2   IvanhoeB50kBx64p  3190  +10/-15/=25 45.00%   22.5/50

[JackStraw]

Rybka 4 edges Houdini 1.5 ......... 50.5 - 49.5

I was testing the Rybka/Houdini " 2-for-1 " theory .........

i7 (940) @ 3.75 / ponder off / 512 mb / Fritz 11 / klo_openings

Houdini gets one core
Rybka gets two cores

Time : 4 mins + 2 secs

Rybka 4 ................. 50.5 ..........+ 29 , - 28 , = 43
(2cores)

Houdini 1.5 .............49.5
(1core)

---------------------

Maybe the Houdini cluster will only have to be half as big as the Rybka cluster ??

[robbolito]

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz4x @3.4 GHz 4,096 MB RAM
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 20.14
KNS: 9667
GUI: Rybka 3
Hash: 256
Book: Masterbook 4-10 moves
TB and GTB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz: 10.0

Code: Select all

1   Houdini 1.5 x64  3190  +14/-5/=11 65.00%   19.5/30
2   IvanhoeB50kBx64  3190  +5/-14/=11 35.00%   10.5/30

Done with SD 14 and contempt factor 2.

[Robert Houdart]

I was testing the Rybka/Houdini " 2-for-1 " theory .........

You see that it's slightly more than a theory .

[robbolito]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz 8.0 GB Memory
Windows 7 Home Premium Edition (Build 7600) 64 bit
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 13.09
KNS: 6280
GUI: Rybka 3
Book: Masterbook 4-10 moves
Hash:256
TB and GTB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz: 10.0

Code: Select all

1   Houdini 1.5 x64   3190  +13/-6/=11 61.67%   18.5/30
2   IvanhoeB50kBx64p  3190  +6/-13/=11 38.33%   11.5/30

SD 10 and contempt factor 2.

[notyetagm]

Rybka 4 edges Houdini 1.5 ......... 50.5 - 49.5

I was testing the Rybka/Houdini " 2-for-1 " theory .........

i7 (940) @ 3.75 / ponder off / 512 mb / Fritz 11 / klo_openings

Houdini gets one core
Rybka gets two cores

Time : 4 mins + 2 secs

Rybka 4 ................. 50.5 ..........+ 29 , - 28 , = 43
(2cores)

Houdini 1.5 .............49.5
(1core)

---------------------

Maybe the Houdini cluster will only have to be half as big as the Rybka cluster ??

ROFLMAO

[notyetagm]

I was testing the Rybka/Houdini " 2-for-1 " theory .........

You see that it's slightly more than a theory .

ROFLMAO

[ThinkingALot]

Maybe the Houdini cluster will only have to be half as big as the Rybka cluster ??

Perhaps even 8-core Houdini will be as strong as 40-core Cluster Rybka .