Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Discussion about chess-playing software (engines, hosts, opening books, platforms, etc...)
BTO7
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:21 am

Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by BTO7 » Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:17 am

http://www.inwoba.de/index.html

Regards
BT

p.s. Great job Robert....It would be scary if you got hungry lol ;)

BTO7
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:21 am

Re: Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by BTO7 » Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:44 am

Image

;)

Regards
BT

User avatar
Robert Houdart
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by Robert Houdart » Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:41 am

BTO7 wrote:p.s. Great job Robert....It would be scary if you got hungry lol ;)
:D
Nice picture above, did you create it?

BTO7
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:21 am

Re: Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by BTO7 » Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:38 pm

Sure did ....when Houdini first came out. Its a combined photo shop job with special fonts i used and a blended pic of a couple different pictures blended into one. Tried to give the logo that magical look :) and of course your more then welcome to it.

Regards
BT

User avatar
Robert Houdart
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by Robert Houdart » Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:30 pm

Thank you, I've just added the image to the Houdini web page with a copyright "(c) BT07" (move your mouse over the picture to see it pop-up), please let me know if you prefer another copyright text or your real name.

Robert

BTO7
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:21 am

Re: Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by BTO7 » Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:56 pm

Thanks Robert. BTO7 good or bad is the only name anyone would know me by but appreciate you asking. Looks great and I'm glad you felt it worthy of your great engine.

Thanks
Bill

LetoAtreides82
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:46 am

Re: Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by LetoAtreides82 » Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:00 am

Yes in my 500 game gauntlet Houdini 1.03a was clearly #1, congrats to Robert on a great engine.

Vael Jean-Paul
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:59 am

Re: Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by Vael Jean-Paul » Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:35 am

Hey guys,i have also Houdini 1.03a as my number one!

Have you played with Large Pages On or Off ?

I have run my tests with Large Pages On ..now some people say that these LP hurts his performance?
Has somebody check this..for sure i will try running games without LP to see the difference!

JP.

michael13
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:20 am
Real Name: michael

Re: Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by michael13 » Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:37 am

how can i check if large page is working for houdini 1.03a is there a log file?????plse advise

User avatar
Robert Houdart
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Houdini 1.03a Tops Rating List

Post by Robert Houdart » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:02 pm

Houdini sends some extra information about the usage of Large Pages to your chess GUI, you should be able to find it in the UCI log files.
When the Large_Pages option is enabled, and your Windows account has the privilege to "Lock pages in memory", Houdini will send one of the following two texts:
- info string XXXX MB Large Page Hash used
- info string XXXX MB Large Page unavailable (OS Error #), using standard pages

It's important to note that very often the Large Page allocation will fail when you're requesting a large block of memory. Windows memory gets fragmented quite rapidly and Windows will very often not be able to allocate a sufficiently large block of unfragmented memory.
When the Large page allocation fails, Houdini will fall back to using normal memory.

You can quickly test this outside your chess GUI. Simply double-click the Houdini exe and enter the following texts in the console:
- setoption name Large_Pages value true
- setoption name Hash value 512

I don't expect any situation in which enabling the "Large_Pages" option would generate a performance loss.

Robert

Post Reply