Ramz Tours & TESTS

[OrgZ]

I see it managed to inflict some damage on the very strong book AdrianOliver

You will find the Author here https://chess.massimilianogoi.com/forum/

As for the winner its actually AdrianOliva.bin who did damage to the opponent


@sedat and all chess friends you are welcome

[Ding-Bat]

Thanks for the info what i meant to say the Huck book found some holes in the Adrian book although yes lost heavily

I see it managed to inflict some damage on the very strong book AdrianOliver

You will find the Author here https://chess.massimilianogoi.com/forum/

As for the winner its actually AdrianOliva.bin who did damage to the opponent


@sedat and all chess friends you are welcome

[OrgZ]

Thanks for the info what i meant to say the Huck book found some holes in the Adrian book although yes lost heavily

I see it managed to inflict some damage on the very strong book AdrianOliver

You will find the Author here https://chess.massimilianogoi.com/forum/

As for the winner its actually AdrianOliva.bin who did damage to the opponent


@sedat and all chess friends you are welcome

Ohh yes now its more clear.

[OrgZ]

Another Dual

There were 2 duals, one with Sawfish 2TC and another bonus with SF-POLY 020624
Optimus2403 vs Huckleberry-v2

MACHINE:14th Gen Core i7-14700K Desktop Processor 20 (8P+12E) Cores
Hash:64
4 threads
TC: 30S+0.20S

Code: Select all

Score of Sawfish 2TC_Huckleberry-v2 vs Sawfish 2TC_OPTIMUS2403: 11 - 24 - 215 [0.474]
...      Sawfish 2TC_Huckleberry-v2 playing White: 6 - 13 - 106  [0.472] 125
...      Sawfish 2TC_Huckleberry-v2 playing Black: 5 - 11 - 109  [0.476] 125
...      White vs Black: 17 - 18 - 215  [0.498] 250
Elo difference: -18.1 +/- 16.0, LOS: 1.4 %, DrawRatio: 86.0 %
250 of 250 games finished.

BONUS ROUND!

Score of SF-POLY 020624_Huckleberry-v2 vs SF-POLY 020624_OPtimus2403: 9 - 14 - 177 [0.487]
...      SF-POLY 020624_Huckleberry-v2 playing White: 5 - 7 - 88  [0.490] 100
...      SF-POLY 020624_Huckleberry-v2 playing Black: 4 - 7 - 89  [0.485] 100
...      White vs Black: 12 - 11 - 177  [0.502] 200
Elo difference: -8.7 +/- 16.3, LOS: 14.9 %, DrawRatio: 88.5 %

though i must say H.berry put quit a fight, if it was long time control it was going to be close score. OPtimus has many moves H.berry suffered due to lack of moves
games:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/1959zbn1 ... 4.pgn/file

https://www.mediafire.com/file/22yupalw ... s.pgn/file

all in all!
Congrats Conrog!

[OrgZ]

Another Fun duel
MACHINE:14th Gen Core i7-14700K Desktop Processor 20 (8P+12E) Cores
Hash:64
4 threads
TC: 30S+0.10S
Due to lack of moves in books as the other went book mode the other was under time trouble and lost on times games were created.
Below is the correction for the time loses
games: 11, 36, 45, 58, 79, 98, 212 are draws
game 10 and 141 go to Huckleberry
game 116 to Hurna 2023

Code: Select all

Result:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  #  name                           games    wins   draws  losses   score    elo    +    -
  1. SF-POLY 190723_Hurna_2023        219      23     178      18     112      3   17   17
  2. SF-POLY 190723_Huckleberry-v4    219      18     178      23     107     -3   17   17

THEREFORE TRUE SCORE IS: 19-17 (Hurna vs Huckleb)
games:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/ymzibhgg ... s.pgn/file

Congrats
Sedat Canbaz (for the compilation of the book) and Hurnavich (Lines come from his books)

[Sedat Canbaz]

Thanks Tanick and it seems Hurna's old dated lines are still not so dead!

On the other hand,
If you already replayed those time lost games is all right..
But anyhow, against time loses (if using fast Bullet 30s+01s):
Move Overhead have to be increased at least: 300+
E.g for SCCT competitions:
I used to play at 30s+06s with Move overhead: 250
And after playing even so many thousands of games:
So far no any game is recorded to be lost on time!

Greetings )

[OrgZ]

Thanks Tanick and it seems Hurna's old dated lines are still not so dead!

On the other hand,
If you already replayed those time lost games is all right..
But anyhow, against time loses (if using fast Bullet 30s+01s):
Move Overhead have to be increased at least: 300+
E.g for SCCT competitions:
I used to play at 30s+06s with Move overhead: 250
And after playing even so many thousands of games:
So far no any game is recorded to be lost on time!

Greetings )

Not at all.
Thanks, i'll consider that next time

[Sedat Canbaz]

Thanks Tanick and it seems Hurna's old dated lines are still not so dead!

On the other hand,
If you already replayed those time lost games is all right..
But anyhow, against time loses (if using fast Bullet 30s+01s):
Move Overhead have to be increased at least: 300+
E.g for SCCT competitions:
I used to play at 30s+06s with Move overhead: 250
And after playing even so many thousands of games:
So far no any game is recorded to be lost on time!

Greetings )

Not at all.
Thanks, i'll consider that next time

You are welcome

By the way, if I was in your shoes..
I'd go at least for 30sec + 0.6sec
Sure if the target to use fast Bullet..
And please stay far away from 30s+0.1s..
Because 0.1s increments is too much critical,
Especially in long-move games such as after 70-80 moves
Actually the more critical is after 120-150 mıoves..
But if adding increment such as 0.6s (per move),
It is much safer..your produced games will be better in quality too!
Sure I'd like to mention again..in any case with fast Bullet,
The move overhead have to be increased at least 250-300

Greetings

[Ding-Bat]

Looks like this new BuBs book maker is on the up with each release.
I'm following with interest good to see a new kid on the block

[OrgZ]

Looks like this new BuBs book maker is on the up with each release.
I'm following with interest good to see a new kid on the block

Yup, if he keeps this momentum going, he will reach top levels

@sedat.
Thanks again