Private19sf

[Ghppn]

Thank you very much, Tanick!

[OrgZ]

[ZamChess]

Thank you very much Tanick !

[Homayoun]

C. Dragon engine is perfect. High level work.
Thanks and best regards

[OrgZ]

C. Dragon engine is perfect. High level work.
Thanks and best regards

Thanks.
But Which version may you be referring to? Their two 3.0 and 3.1 or is it all in general

[Homayoun]

C. Dragon engine is perfect. High level work.
Thanks and best regards

Thanks.
But Which version may you be referring to? Their two 3.0 and 3.1 or is it all in general

Hi
The engine got better and better.According to me version 3.1 is stronger and I think (guess) you have worked on evaluation more. I like this engine very much. It plays nice positional style. (Not boring positional). I payed with Private sf 19 too, but I like C. Dragon more. It plays perfect.
Best regards

[OrgZ]

TEST by ADRIAN OLIVA

RapTora 3.0_avx2 (Anton101) vs. Private19Sf_avx2 (OrgZ and JaR Heads)

Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: Perfect 2023 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces - NNUE: Private19Sf: B12tz.evL and B7tz.evL - Raptora 3.0: nn-c38c3d8d3920.nnue - Raptora 3.0 Experience On and Learning fom Experience Original File 1KB and Tactical: 2

Book Settings:

1.Tournament ON
2.Min games 0-35
3.Variety of play 150
4.Influence of learn 100
5.Learning strength 500

DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 3min+1seg 0


1 RapTora 3.0_avx2 +2/=496/-2 50.00% 250.0/500 -3036.00
2 Private19Sf_avx2 +2/=496/-2 50.00% 250.0/500 -3036.00

If you like and would like to follow Adrian Oliva tests Join
https://chess.massimilianogoi.com/forum ... 2725#p2725

Though perfect suites are very drawish, am Very impressive by Raptora
Anton really did some work!



Killfish 150624_avx2 (Anton101) vs. C_Dragon v3.1_avx2(OrgZ)

Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book:OliBiyu Green Light 2.5 Opening Suite ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces - NNUE: C Dragon v3.1: B12tz.evL and B7tz.evL - Killfish 150624: nn-fd53ae6743c5.nnue and nn-37f18f62d772.nnue

Book Settings:

1.Tournament ON
2.Min games 0-35
3.Variety of play 300
4.Influence of learn 100
5.Learning strength 500

DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 3min+1seg 0


1 C_Dragon v3.1_avx2 +3 +5/=494/-1 50.40% 252.0/500
2 Killfish 150624_avx2 -3 +1/=494/-5 49.60% 248.0/500

If you like and would like to follow Adrian Oliva tests Join
https://chess.massimilianogoi.com/forum ... 2725#p2725

Congratulations OrgZ!

Thank you Adrian

[Homayoun]

Hi
Try to keep this engine (C Dragon) up always. It’s the best engine of yours I have seen . ( it is just my idea and may be I am wrong. ) I don’t say this just for it’s results in tournaments. May be in another tournament with different conditions we see different results. Killifish is also very strong and interesting engine too. But about your C-Dragon engine, besides the strength, I consider it’s playing style and I want to repeat here: It plays perfect.
Best regards

[OrgZ]

Hi
Try to keep this engine (C Dragon) up always. It’s the best engine of yours I have seen . ( it is just my idea and may be I am wrong. ) I don’t say this just for it’s results in tournaments. May be in another tournament with different conditions we see different results. Killifish is also very strong and interesting engine too. But about your C-Dragon engine, besides the strength, I consider it’s playing style and I want to repeat here: It plays perfect.
Best regards

i agree, but the problem is that he demands too many changes. C_Dragon is not just a search change too many source files are altered for the code that i wrote to work + alot of testing.

[capachess]

Hi
Try to keep this engine (C Dragon) up always. It’s the best engine of yours I have seen . ( it is just my idea and may be I am wrong. ) I don’t say this just for it’s results in tournaments. May be in another tournament with different conditions we see different results. Killifish is also very strong and interesting engine too. But about your C-Dragon engine, besides the strength, I consider it’s playing style and I want to repeat here: It plays perfect.
Best regards

i agree, but the problem is that he demands too many changes. C_Dragon is not just a search change too many source files are altered for the code that i wrote to work + alot of testing.

Congratulations on your good work