PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Code, algorithms, languages, construction...
Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:05 pm

What should we say about his results? He's been cheating on us all on PlayChess for a year by playing against himself and his friends just to boost their rating. A few weeks ago AlexChess created another account on PlayChess just so he could play against himself (etabeta23). He only plays against himself because otherwise he will lose. Only losers have to cheat!

These are his last games on PlayChess (against etabeta23, his own second account) - LIVE:
Image

What a big guy he is! :lol:
Peace be with you!

Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:23 pm

See for yourself, here are some of his victories (playchess.com) against himself (etabeta23) - download:
https://pixeldrain.com/u/sZ9PU7f8

What a big player! :lol:

[Event "3 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2023.11.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "EtaBeta23, Etabeta 231127"]
[Black "ProteuSF-Official, ProteusSFX-AI 23110"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C52"]
[WhiteElo "3221"]
[BlackElo "3339"]
[Annotator "0.26;-0.41"]
[PlyCount "84"]
[EventDate "2023.11.27"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 {0.01/0 1} e5 {0.01/0 0} 2. Nf3 {0.01/0 0} Nc6 {0.01/0 0} 3. Bc4 {0.01/0 0} Bc5 {0.01/0 0} 4. b4 {0.01/0 0} Bxb4 {0.01/0 0} 5. c3 {0.01/0 0} Ba5 {0.01/0 0} 6. d4 {0.01/0 0} d6 {0.01/0 0} 7. Qb3 {0.01/0 0} Qd7 {0.01/0 0} 8. O-O {0.01/0 0} Bb6 {0.01/0 0} 9. Nbd2 {0.01/0 0} Na5 {0.01/0 0} 10. Qc2 {0.01/0 0} f6 {0.01/0 0} 11. a4 {0.01/0 0} Ne7 {0.01/0 0} 12. Ba2 {0.01/0 0} Nec6 {0.01/0 0} 13. Re1 {0.01/0 0} Qe7 {0.01/0 0} 14. Ba3 {0.01/0 0} g5 {0.01/0 0} 15. Nf1 {0.01/0 0} Bg4 {0.01/0 0} 16. d5 {0.01/0 0} Nb8 {0.01/0 0} 17. N3d2 {0.01/0 0} Nd7 {0.01/0 0} 18. Qb1 {0.26/20 6} f5 {-0.41/21 2 (0-0)} 19. h3 {-0.50/25 17 (c4)} f4 {-1.58/23 2} 20. Nh2 {-1.65/19 2 (hxg4)} Bh5 {-2.35/20 2} 21. c4 {-2.38/21 6 (b4)} Rg8 {-2.76/23 5} 22. Ng4 {-2.90/25 11} Bxg4 {-3.30/25 0} 23. hxg4 {-3.05/20 5} O-O-O {-3.30/25 0} 24. Rc1 {-2.91/21 8 (c5)} Rh8 {-3.91/22 2} 25. c5 {-4.02/23 6} Nxc5 {-4.25/23 0} 26. Kf1 {-4.22/22 6 (c4)} h5 {-4.55/22 2} 27. Ke2 {-4.42/22 3 (xc5)} hxg4 {-4.89/21 2} 28. Nc4 {-4.49/18 1 (xc5)} f3+ {-5.96/19 2} 29. gxf3 {-5.39/19 0} Nxc4 {-6.36/23 2 (f6)} 30. Bxc4 {-6.11/21 4 (xc5)} Qf6 {-6.91/19 2} 31. Rc3 {-6.61/20 0} Nxa4 {-7.08/22 2} 32. Rb3 {-6.99/19 3} Rh2 {-7.34/22 0} 33. Bb4 {-7.18/20 4 (b5)} Rxf2+ {-11.27/19 2 (g3)} 34. Kd1 {-8.70/17 1} Rh8 {-12.67/18 0} 35. Be1 {-11.12/18 3 (d3)} Rh1 {-14.22/19 4} 36. Rxa4 {-12.24/18 0} g3 {-15.27/18 3} 37. Rb2 {-12.18/17 0 (a2)} Qxf3+ {-#7/36 2} 38. Be2 {-#6/48 0} Qc3 {-#6/39 0 (xe1+)} 39. Rd2 {0} Rxe1+ {-#5/81 1} 40. Kxe1 {0} g2 {-#4/245 0} 41. Kd1 {0 (g4+)} g1=Q+ {-#2/245 0} 42. Bf1 {0} Qxf1# {-#1/245 0 (Lag: Av=0.42s, max=1.5s)} 0-1

[Event "3 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2023.11.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "ProteuSF-Official, ProteusSFX-AI 23110"]
[Black "EtaBeta23, Etabeta 231127"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C52"]
[WhiteElo "3371"]
[BlackElo "3190"]
[Annotator "0.32;?ev?"]
[PlyCount "83"]
[EventDate "2023.11.27"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 {0.01/0 0} e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0.01/0 0} Nc6 {0} 3. Bc4 {0.01/0 0} Bc5 {0} 4. b4 {0.01/0 0} Bxb4 {0} 5. c3 {0.01/0 0} Ba5 {0} 6. d4 {0.01/0 0} d6 {0} 7. Qb3 {0.01/0 0} Qd7 {0} 8. O-O {0.01/0 0} Bb6 {0} 9. Nbd2 {0.01/0 0} Na5 {0} 10. Qc2 {0.01/0 0} f6 {0} 11. a4 {0.01/0 0} Ne7 {0} 12. Ba2 {0.01/0 0} Nec6 {0} 13. Re1 {0.01/0 0} Qe7 {0} 14. Ba3 {0.01/0 0} g5 {0} 15. Nf1 {0.01/0 0} Bg4 {0} 16. d5 {0.01/0 0} Nb8 {0} 17. N3d2 {0.01/0 0} Nd7 {0} 18. Rab1 {0.32/24 2} O-O {7 (c5)} 19. Rb5 {0.98/26 5} a6 {10 (h8)} 20. Rxb6 {1.71/24 2} cxb6 {17} 21. Ne3 {1.98/30 0} Bh5 {3} 22. Nf5 {2.02/24 0} Qe8 {15} 23. Bxd6 {2.17/27 0} Nc5 {2 (g6)} 24. Bxf8 {2.32/23 2} Kxf8 {2} 25. Qb1 {2.39/22 0} b5 {3} 26. Nf1 {2.41/25 0} Qd7 {10 (b6)} 27. h4 {2.98/21 2} h6 {5 (g6)} 28. N1g3 {3.72/22 2} Bf7 {3 (g6)} 29. Nxh6 {4.54/19 2} gxh4 {1} 30. Ngf5 {4.71/21 3} Rd8 {0 (h5)} 31. axb5 {5.59/22 3} Ra8 {2 (axb5)} 32. Qd1 {6.57/20 2} Be8 {1} 33. Qg4 {7.69/21 1} Qh7 {1} 34. Qxh4 {7.83/21 0} Bh5 {2 (d7)} 35. Qxf6+ {11.42/21 2} Ke8 {0} 36. Qxe5+ {12.53/20 2} Kd8 {2} 37. Qf6+ {13.42/18 0} Ke8 {2 (d7)} 38. e5 {30.89/22 5} b6 {2 (d7)} 39. e6 {#7/40 2} Ncb7 {0 (ab7)} 40. d6 {#5/81 1} Nc5 {0 (d8)} 41. d7+ {#2/245 0} Qxd7 {0 (xd7)} 42. Qh8# {#1/245 0 (Lag: Av=0.39s, max=1.9s)} 1-0

[Event "3 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2023.11.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "EtaBeta23, Etabeta 231127"]
[Black "ProteuSF-Official, ProteusSFX-AI 23110"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C52"]
[WhiteElo "3181"]
[BlackElo "3380"]
[Annotator "?ev?;-0.47"]
[PlyCount "96"]
[EventDate "2023.11.27"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 {0} e5 {0.01/0 0} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {0.01/0 0} 3. Bc4 {0} Bc5 {0.01/0 0} 4. b4 {0} Bxb4 {0.01/0 0} 5. c3 {0} Ba5 {0.01/0 0} 6. d4 {0} d6 {0.01/0 0} 7. Qb3 {0} Qd7 {0.01/0 0} 8. O-O {0} Bb6 {0.01/0 0} 9. Nbd2 {0} Na5 {0.01/0 0} 10. Qc2 {0} f6 {0.01/0 0} 11. a4 {0} Ne7 {0.01/0 0} 12. Ba2 {0} Nec6 {0.01/0 0} 13. Re1 {0} Qe7 {0.01/0 0} 14. Ba3 {0} g5 {0.01/0 0} 15. Nf1 {0} Bg4 {0.01/0 0} 16. d5 {0} Nb8 {0.01/0 0} 17. N3d2 {0} Nd7 {0.01/0 0} 18. h3 {10} Bh5 {-0.47/23 2} 19. Ne3 {7 (ab1)} Bxe3 {-0.39/26 5} 20. Rxe3 {1} b6 {-0.33/24 1} 21. Ree1 {3 (b4)} O-O {-0.67/27 5} 22. Bb4 {8} Nb7 {-0.63/28 0} 23. Nf1 {2 (a5)} a5 {-0.97/27 5} 24. Ba3 {1} Ndc5 {-0.99/28 6} 25. Bc4 {1} Be8 {-1.05/22 0} 26. Bb5 {5 (c1)} Bxb5 {-1.02/25 2} 27. axb5 {2} Qd7 {-1.11/23 0} 28. Bc1 {4 (g3)} Qxb5 {-1.59/25 2} 29. Ne3 {2 (e3)} Qd3 {-3.23/22 1} 30. f3 {7 (xd3)} Qxc2 {-3.60/24 2} 31. Nxc2 {2} Nb3 {-3.71/27 0} 32. Rb1 {4} Nxc1 {-3.80/28 0} 33. Rexc1 {5 (bxc1)} f5 {-3.94/29 1} 34. exf5 {8} Rxf5 {-3.99/29 0} 35. Na3 {3} Raf8 {-3.98/28 1} 36. Kf1 {2 (b5)} e4 {-4.39/24 2} 37. c4 {0 (b5)} exf3 {-4.57/29 5} 38. Re1 {0} Nc5 {-4.60/24 1} 39. g4 {4 (b5)} Rf4 {-5.51/21 2} 40. Ra1 {2 (c2)} h5 {-6.65/21 2} 41. Rac1 {1 (e6)} hxg4 {-8.20/23 2} 42. hxg4 {1} Rxg4 {-8.55/21 0} 43. Nb5 {1 (e3)} Nd3 {-11.94/20 2} 44. Re7 {1 (ed1)} Rh4 {-#7/58 1} 45. Rh7 {0 (g1)} Rxh7 {-#5/154 1} 46. Kg1 {0} Rf4 {-#4/245 0} 47. c5 {0 (c2)} Rg4+ {-#2/245 0} 48. Kf1 {0} Rh1# {-#1/245 0 (Lag: Av=0.31s, max=1.2s)} 0-1
Peace be with you!

AlexChess
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:25 am
Real Name: Alex Morales

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by AlexChess » Thu Dec 14, 2023 12:28 pm

ProteusSFX-AI 231109 vs ShashChess 34.5 Final result: 5-1 (+4)
Blitz 5+0 on Core i5 2 MN/s

Against BrainLearn 26.5 I have lost 3-4. It's seems that my engine performes much better against the 2th engine of my friend Prof. Andrea Manzo, using the same book Eman.bin, but I have learning enabled, while Shashchess hasn't it, and I add all the won games of both sides on my continually updated books :mrgreen:

Image

Ediot It's nice to have you on my ignore list. I always don't read anyone of your dummy comments ;)

AlexChess
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:25 am
Real Name: Alex Morales

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by AlexChess » Thu Dec 14, 2023 4:46 pm

BANKSIAGUI 300 GAMES GAUNTLET UPDATE 231214

Blitz 5+0 - 2 MN/s - 2400 games

Image

NOTES:
Generic book for all opponents: Eman.bin vs My ProteusSF-Books continously updated

Experiments:
No books for ProteusSFX-AI vs Stockfish 2xNNUE
TCEC unbalanced books for ProteusSFX-AI vs Light 12 Pro

AlexChess
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:25 am
Real Name: Alex Morales

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by AlexChess » Thu Dec 14, 2023 7:09 pm

ANOTHER POV OF THE GAUNTLET

Image

My openings book creation strategy is working!

30.000 games (draws and won) from 1 year of Playchess, against all the engines.
All the won games from this Gauntlet (2400 games until now)

The current match against Blue Marlin 15.7 is going really well, while I have lost the one with other
@dorsz engine Swordfish (3-4) (I will send you all the new games, too ;)

With Ediot's Light 12 Pro I have used unbalanced TCEC suite, repeating each position on both sides, while (for the same reason) with Linrock's Experimental Stockfish 2xNNUE I have disabled all books to tests their influence and verify only the strength of the engines.

AlexChess
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:25 am
Real Name: Alex Morales

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by AlexChess » Thu Dec 14, 2023 7:11 pm

ANOTHER POV ABOUT THE GAUNTLET

Image

My openings book creation strategy is working!

30.000 games (draws and won) from 1 year of Playchess, against all the engines.
All the won games from this Gauntlet (2400 games until now)

The current offline match against Blue Marlin 15.7 is going really well until now,

Image

while I have lost the one with the other @dorsz engine Swordfish (3-4)
(I will send you all the new games, too my Polish chess friend, BM is perfect for problem solving ;) )

With Ediot's Light 12 Pro I have used unbalanced TCEC suite, repeating each position on both sides, while (for the same reason) with Linrock's Experimental Stockfish 2xNNUE I have disabled all books to tests their influence and verify only the strength of the engines.
Last edited by AlexChess on Thu Dec 14, 2023 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Thu Dec 14, 2023 8:49 pm

:mrgreen: Cheater King ProteusSF the Greatest :lol: :lol: :lol:

If your engine was as great as it was in your cheating private tournaments, you wouldn't have to cheat on the server. That is fact... but you are a cheater. All your games are cheated, like your server games:

[Event "3 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2023.11.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "EtaBeta23, Etabeta 231127"]
[Black "ProteuSF-Official, ProteusSFX-AI 23110"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C52"]
[WhiteElo "3181"]
[BlackElo "3380"]
[Annotator "?ev?;-0.47"]
[PlyCount "96"]
[EventDate "2023.11.27"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 {0} e5 {0.01/0 0} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {0.01/0 0} 3. Bc4 {0} Bc5 {0.01/0 0} 4. b4 {0} Bxb4 {0.01/0 0} 5. c3 {0} Ba5 {0.01/0 0} 6. d4 {0} d6 {0.01/0 0} 7. Qb3 {0} Qd7 {0.01/0 0} 8. O-O {0} Bb6 {0.01/0 0} 9. Nbd2 {0} Na5 {0.01/0 0} 10. Qc2 {0} f6 {0.01/0 0} 11. a4 {0} Ne7 {0.01/0 0} 12. Ba2 {0} Nec6 {0.01/0 0} 13. Re1 {0} Qe7 {0.01/0 0} 14. Ba3 {0} g5 {0.01/0 0} 15. Nf1 {0} Bg4 {0.01/0 0} 16. d5 {0} Nb8 {0.01/0 0} 17. N3d2 {0} Nd7 {0.01/0 0} 18. h3 {10} Bh5 {-0.47/23 2} 19. Ne3 {7 (ab1)} Bxe3 {-0.39/26 5} 20. Rxe3 {1} b6 {-0.33/24 1} 21. Ree1 {3 (b4)} O-O {-0.67/27 5} 22. Bb4 {8} Nb7 {-0.63/28 0} 23. Nf1 {2 (a5)} a5 {-0.97/27 5} 24. Ba3 {1} Ndc5 {-0.99/28 6} 25. Bc4 {1} Be8 {-1.05/22 0} 26. Bb5 {5 (c1)} Bxb5 {-1.02/25 2} 27. axb5 {2} Qd7 {-1.11/23 0} 28. Bc1 {4 (g3)} Qxb5 {-1.59/25 2} 29. Ne3 {2 (e3)} Qd3 {-3.23/22 1} 30. f3 {7 (xd3)} Qxc2 {-3.60/24 2} 31. Nxc2 {2} Nb3 {-3.71/27 0} 32. Rb1 {4} Nxc1 {-3.80/28 0} 33. Rexc1 {5 (bxc1)} f5 {-3.94/29 1} 34. exf5 {8} Rxf5 {-3.99/29 0} 35. Na3 {3} Raf8 {-3.98/28 1} 36. Kf1 {2 (b5)} e4 {-4.39/24 2} 37. c4 {0 (b5)} exf3 {-4.57/29 5} 38. Re1 {0} Nc5 {-4.60/24 1} 39. g4 {4 (b5)} Rf4 {-5.51/21 2} 40. Ra1 {2 (c2)} h5 {-6.65/21 2} 41. Rac1 {1 (e6)} hxg4 {-8.20/23 2} 42. hxg4 {1} Rxg4 {-8.55/21 0} 43. Nb5 {1 (e3)} Nd3 {-11.94/20 2} 44. Re7 {1 (ed1)} Rh4 {-#7/58 1} 45. Rh7 {0 (g1)} Rxh7 {-#5/154 1} 46. Kg1 {0} Rf4 {-#4/245 0} 47. c5 {0 (c2)} Rg4+ {-#2/245 0} 48. Kf1 {0} Rh1# {-#1/245 0 (Lag: Av=0.31s, max=1.2s)} 0-1
Peace be with you!

Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Thu Dec 14, 2023 9:47 pm

Again for all of us:
Engine ProteusSF
117 wins and only 64 losses.

Nacked results. No PGN for all of us as proof. But I have evidence from the server where ProteusSF only plays against itself and only wins against itself. Haha. If his engine is so great, why is he cheating on the server? Why? He doesn't give us an answer and just continues to post his nonsensical offline results. Not giving an answer is also an answer: He is deceiving us. :(
Peace be with you!

AlexChess
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:25 am
Real Name: Alex Morales

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by AlexChess » Fri Dec 15, 2023 8:36 am

Since anyway they cannot do worse than Ediot, I have decided to test also other Stockfish derivatives, starting from Cool Iris 11.70 :)

AlexChess
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:25 am
Real Name: Alex Morales

Re: PRIVATE ProteusSFX-AI tests

Post by AlexChess » Fri Dec 15, 2023 10:12 am

SNEAK PEAK OF THE CURRENT MATCH

Blue Marlin is very good on tests solving and is much faster than ProteusSFX-AI on the same hardware (1.4 Mn/s vs 1.8 Mn/s, 24 vs 27 plies) but probably it's suffering my new Super Books. @dorsz I will give you all the games, so we can investigate what is happening ;)

Image

Post Reply