Sun 1.1 Engine

[James666]

What nonsense, are you drunk? These are all private engines and I don't share any source code. So you can't know what I implemented. You're just speculating. In the chat on PlayChess, your engine is associated with Engine Raid. You should be a pure cloner, that's not my statement but from other people I don't know.

Keep it up...Raid-Cloner

Mr Eduard, would you post the Sun Light 6.1 to E-Mail 553165305@qq.com, please?

[Eduard Nemeth]

No. Read news from my homepage:

https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/solista-news/

13. Oct 2023: For using Polyglot books, I recommend Polyfish by Khalid Omar. I recompiled the latest version with external network and MinimumThinkingTime. Engine Options --> Picture.
Download: Polyfish 231013 (avx2, bmi2, sse41, modern, source code): https://pixeldrain.com/u/HPDbf9vU

Silentfish 1.0 by Solista. This engine is identical to my engine Sun 6.1, but it supports two Polyglot books. The engine is private, because I don't want to share the source code. If you buy an opening book from Solista, I can include the engine as a private version for testing purposes (avx2, bmi2, sse41 and modern). The engine is compiled with external network (NNUE) and as feature is MinimumThinkingTime implemented. Engine Options --> Picture. For online games you should use MinimumThinkingTime, the value 100 (100ms) has proven to be effective. When using my Polyglot books, Best Book Move should be disabled! Today from PlayChess Server, Sun 6.1 on top --> Picture. However, the strength of the engine is the good analysis mode.

[James666]

You said nonsense and junk cheater~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[STUDENT_MASTER]

No. Read news from my homepage:

https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/solista-news/

13. Oct 2023: For using Polyglot books, I recommend Polyfish by Khalid Omar. I recompiled the latest version with external network and MinimumThinkingTime. Engine Options --> Picture.
Download: Polyfish 231013 (avx2, bmi2, sse41, modern, source code): https://pixeldrain.com/u/HPDbf9vU

Silentfish 1.0 by Solista. This engine is identical to my engine Sun 6.1, but it supports two Polyglot books. The engine is private, because I don't want to share the source code. If you buy an opening book from Solista, I can include the engine as a private version for testing purposes (avx2, bmi2, sse41 and modern). The engine is compiled with external network (NNUE) and as feature is MinimumThinkingTime implemented. Engine Options --> Picture. For online games you should use MinimumThinkingTime, the value 100 (100ms) has proven to be effective. When using my Polyglot books, Best Book Move should be disabled! Today from PlayChess Server, Sun 6.1 on top --> Picture. However, the strength of the engine is the good analysis mode.

another copy of other authors, you fucken bitch, shit face

[AlexChess]

LICHESS ALL BOTS RATING LISTS

Top 50 November 25, 2023 First Bullet, Blitz, Rapid & Classical

[Eduard Nemeth]

LICHESS ALL BOTS RATING LISTS

Top 50 November 25, 2023 First Bullet, Blitz, Rapid & Classical

This guy is a dazzler. Of the 5394 BULLET games from "ProteusSF" account, only 341 games were played against opponents with Elo over >2800.

Of the 341 games, there were 60 wins, of which ProteusSF losed 53. His rating is based on farming and it's no surprise that he doesn't want to play against strong opponents.

Against weak opponent admete_bot, ProteusSF played 3077 of his 5394 games:



admete_bot is a weak program with an Elo of around 2400. I have stopped playing against such opponents otherwise I would be ashamed. ProteusSF is of course not ashamed, he would also play 100.000 games against such opponents if he could gain another 100 Elo. Maybe he'll do that at some point. He will never want to play against opponents like me. Other people (including here in the forum) have also reported to me that ProteusSF doesn't accept any challenges against them because they are too strong for him. ProteusSF only requires sacrifices for its Elo rating.

Proof, all bullet games from ProteusSF in PGN sorted by date:
https://pixeldrain.com/u/VFVdxAUR

[Eduard Nemeth]

Next chapter PlayChess:

After ProteusSF initially played his way up to over 3400 Elo through cheating, he played a duel that he clearly lost and plummeted in the rating.

Photo:



Now he had to cheat again to get to the top. Him, or a friend of his, create a new account today. You always start at 2400 Elo points. Anyone who wins against Elo 2400 does not get any Elo points if they are more than 600 Elo better.

The account EtaBeta23 initially collected Elos. He played 110 games in a series draw, some of them with the strongest players who played with 30 or more threads. Then the time came for cheating.



Of the 7 defeats, EtaBeta23 lost 6 times in a row against ProteusSF. That's what cheater superstars like ProteusSF do, who like to boast, but in reality they are a disgrace to our hobby. I watched 3 games, here they are in PGN:

[Event "3 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2023.11.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "EtaBeta23, Etabeta 231127"]
[Black "ProteuSF-Official, ProteusSFX-AI 23110"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C52"]
[WhiteElo "3221"]
[BlackElo "3339"]
[Annotator "0.26;-0.41"]
[PlyCount "84"]
[EventDate "2023.11.27"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 {0.01/0 1} e5 {0.01/0 0} 2. Nf3 {0.01/0 0} Nc6 {0.01/0 0} 3. Bc4 {0.01/0 0} Bc5 {0.01/0 0} 4. b4 {0.01/0 0} Bxb4 {0.01/0 0} 5. c3 {0.01/0 0} Ba5 {0.01/0 0} 6. d4 {0.01/0 0} d6 {0.01/0 0} 7. Qb3 {0.01/0 0} Qd7 {0.01/0 0} 8. O-O {0.01/0 0} Bb6 {0.01/0 0} 9. Nbd2 {0.01/0 0} Na5 {0.01/0 0} 10. Qc2 {0.01/0 0} f6 {0.01/0 0} 11. a4 {0.01/0 0} Ne7 {0.01/0 0} 12. Ba2 {0.01/0 0} Nec6 {0.01/0 0} 13. Re1 {0.01/0 0} Qe7 {0.01/0 0} 14. Ba3 {0.01/0 0} g5 {0.01/0 0} 15. Nf1 {0.01/0 0} Bg4 {0.01/0 0} 16. d5 {0.01/0 0} Nb8 {0.01/0 0} 17. N3d2 {0.01/0 0} Nd7 {0.01/0 0} 18. Qb1 {0.26/20 6} f5 {-0.41/21 2 (0-0)} 19. h3 {-0.50/25 17 (c4)} f4 {-1.58/23 2} 20. Nh2 {-1.65/19 2 (hxg4)} Bh5 {-2.35/20 2} 21. c4 {-2.38/21 6 (b4)} Rg8 {-2.76/23 5} 22. Ng4 {-2.90/25 11} Bxg4 {-3.30/25 0} 23. hxg4 {-3.05/20 5} O-O-O {-3.30/25 0} 24. Rc1 {-2.91/21 8 (c5)} Rh8 {-3.91/22 2} 25. c5 {-4.02/23 6} Nxc5 {-4.25/23 0} 26. Kf1 {-4.22/22 6 (c4)} h5 {-4.55/22 2} 27. Ke2 {-4.42/22 3 (xc5)} hxg4 {-4.89/21 2} 28. Nc4 {-4.49/18 1 (xc5)} f3+ {-5.96/19 2} 29. gxf3 {-5.39/19 0} Nxc4 {-6.36/23 2 (f6)} 30. Bxc4 {-6.11/21 4 (xc5)} Qf6 {-6.91/19 2} 31. Rc3 {-6.61/20 0} Nxa4 {-7.08/22 2} 32. Rb3 {-6.99/19 3} Rh2 {-7.34/22 0} 33. Bb4 {-7.18/20 4 (b5)} Rxf2+ {-11.27/19 2 (g3)} 34. Kd1 {-8.70/17 1} Rh8 {-12.67/18 0} 35. Be1 {-11.12/18 3 (d3)} Rh1 {-14.22/19 4} 36. Rxa4 {-12.24/18 0} g3 {-15.27/18 3} 37. Rb2 {-12.18/17 0 (a2)} Qxf3+ {-#7/36 2} 38. Be2 {-#6/48 0} Qc3 {-#6/39 0 (xe1+)} 39. Rd2 {0} Rxe1+ {-#5/81 1} 40. Kxe1 {0} g2 {-#4/245 0} 41. Kd1 {0 (g4+)} g1=Q+ {-#2/245 0} 42. Bf1 {0} Qxf1# {-#1/245 0 (Lag: Av=0.42s, max=1.5s)} 0-1

[Event "3 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2023.11.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "ProteuSF-Official, ProteusSFX-AI 23110"]
[Black "EtaBeta23, Etabeta 231127"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C52"]
[WhiteElo "3371"]
[BlackElo "3190"]
[Annotator "0.32;?ev?"]
[PlyCount "83"]
[EventDate "2023.11.27"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 {0.01/0 0} e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0.01/0 0} Nc6 {0} 3. Bc4 {0.01/0 0} Bc5 {0} 4. b4 {0.01/0 0} Bxb4 {0} 5. c3 {0.01/0 0} Ba5 {0} 6. d4 {0.01/0 0} d6 {0} 7. Qb3 {0.01/0 0} Qd7 {0} 8. O-O {0.01/0 0} Bb6 {0} 9. Nbd2 {0.01/0 0} Na5 {0} 10. Qc2 {0.01/0 0} f6 {0} 11. a4 {0.01/0 0} Ne7 {0} 12. Ba2 {0.01/0 0} Nec6 {0} 13. Re1 {0.01/0 0} Qe7 {0} 14. Ba3 {0.01/0 0} g5 {0} 15. Nf1 {0.01/0 0} Bg4 {0} 16. d5 {0.01/0 0} Nb8 {0} 17. N3d2 {0.01/0 0} Nd7 {0} 18. Rab1 {0.32/24 2} O-O {7 (c5)} 19. Rb5 {0.98/26 5} a6 {10 (h8)} 20. Rxb6 {1.71/24 2} cxb6 {17} 21. Ne3 {1.98/30 0} Bh5 {3} 22. Nf5 {2.02/24 0} Qe8 {15} 23. Bxd6 {2.17/27 0} Nc5 {2 (g6)} 24. Bxf8 {2.32/23 2} Kxf8 {2} 25. Qb1 {2.39/22 0} b5 {3} 26. Nf1 {2.41/25 0} Qd7 {10 (b6)} 27. h4 {2.98/21 2} h6 {5 (g6)} 28. N1g3 {3.72/22 2} Bf7 {3 (g6)} 29. Nxh6 {4.54/19 2} gxh4 {1} 30. Ngf5 {4.71/21 3} Rd8 {0 (h5)} 31. axb5 {5.59/22 3} Ra8 {2 (axb5)} 32. Qd1 {6.57/20 2} Be8 {1} 33. Qg4 {7.69/21 1} Qh7 {1} 34. Qxh4 {7.83/21 0} Bh5 {2 (d7)} 35. Qxf6+ {11.42/21 2} Ke8 {0} 36. Qxe5+ {12.53/20 2} Kd8 {2} 37. Qf6+ {13.42/18 0} Ke8 {2 (d7)} 38. e5 {30.89/22 5} b6 {2 (d7)} 39. e6 {#7/40 2} Ncb7 {0 (ab7)} 40. d6 {#5/81 1} Nc5 {0 (d8)} 41. d7+ {#2/245 0} Qxd7 {0 (xd7)} 42. Qh8# {#1/245 0 (Lag: Av=0.39s, max=1.9s)} 1-0

[Event "3 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2023.11.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "EtaBeta23, Etabeta 231127"]
[Black "ProteuSF-Official, ProteusSFX-AI 23110"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C52"]
[WhiteElo "3181"]
[BlackElo "3380"]
[Annotator "?ev?;-0.47"]
[PlyCount "96"]
[EventDate "2023.11.27"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 {0} e5 {0.01/0 0} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {0.01/0 0} 3. Bc4 {0} Bc5 {0.01/0 0} 4. b4 {0} Bxb4 {0.01/0 0} 5. c3 {0} Ba5 {0.01/0 0} 6. d4 {0} d6 {0.01/0 0} 7. Qb3 {0} Qd7 {0.01/0 0} 8. O-O {0} Bb6 {0.01/0 0} 9. Nbd2 {0} Na5 {0.01/0 0} 10. Qc2 {0} f6 {0.01/0 0} 11. a4 {0} Ne7 {0.01/0 0} 12. Ba2 {0} Nec6 {0.01/0 0} 13. Re1 {0} Qe7 {0.01/0 0} 14. Ba3 {0} g5 {0.01/0 0} 15. Nf1 {0} Bg4 {0.01/0 0} 16. d5 {0} Nb8 {0.01/0 0} 17. N3d2 {0} Nd7 {0.01/0 0} 18. h3 {10} Bh5 {-0.47/23 2} 19. Ne3 {7 (ab1)} Bxe3 {-0.39/26 5} 20. Rxe3 {1} b6 {-0.33/24 1} 21. Ree1 {3 (b4)} O-O {-0.67/27 5} 22. Bb4 {8} Nb7 {-0.63/28 0} 23. Nf1 {2 (a5)} a5 {-0.97/27 5} 24. Ba3 {1} Ndc5 {-0.99/28 6} 25. Bc4 {1} Be8 {-1.05/22 0} 26. Bb5 {5 (c1)} Bxb5 {-1.02/25 2} 27. axb5 {2} Qd7 {-1.11/23 0} 28. Bc1 {4 (g3)} Qxb5 {-1.59/25 2} 29. Ne3 {2 (e3)} Qd3 {-3.23/22 1} 30. f3 {7 (xd3)} Qxc2 {-3.60/24 2} 31. Nxc2 {2} Nb3 {-3.71/27 0} 32. Rb1 {4} Nxc1 {-3.80/28 0} 33. Rexc1 {5 (bxc1)} f5 {-3.94/29 1} 34. exf5 {8} Rxf5 {-3.99/29 0} 35. Na3 {3} Raf8 {-3.98/28 1} 36. Kf1 {2 (b5)} e4 {-4.39/24 2} 37. c4 {0 (b5)} exf3 {-4.57/29 5} 38. Re1 {0} Nc5 {-4.60/24 1} 39. g4 {4 (b5)} Rf4 {-5.51/21 2} 40. Ra1 {2 (c2)} h5 {-6.65/21 2} 41. Rac1 {1 (e6)} hxg4 {-8.20/23 2} 42. hxg4 {1} Rxg4 {-8.55/21 0} 43. Nb5 {1 (e3)} Nd3 {-11.94/20 2} 44. Re7 {1 (ed1)} Rh4 {-#7/58 1} 45. Rh7 {0 (g1)} Rxh7 {-#5/154 1} 46. Kg1 {0} Rf4 {-#4/245 0} 47. c5 {0 (c2)} Rg4+ {-#2/245 0} 48. Kf1 {0} Rh1# {-#1/245 0 (Lag: Av=0.31s, max=1.2s)} 0-1

Previously 110 games draw, and now checkmate in series in less than 50 moves. These are destroyers of our hobby and that's why I showed the games for everyone to see.

Download PGN: https://pixeldrain.com/u/sZ9PU7f8

[AlexChess]

AGAIN????

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3842&p=31856#p31856. <-- answered here

All chess chess servers and forums are a shame. People cheating everywhere and you say that I'm acting badly
playing only with highter ELO engines on Playchess and only with lower ELO on Lichess.

NOW AS A PROTEST I HAVE REALLY DONE WHAT YOUR FRIENDS
HAVE DONE DOZENS OF TIMES! (AND YOU HAVE NEVER SAID ANYHING TO THEM)

You are really confused

[IbaiBuR]

He is cheating with his own account, as you can see the name of the account is very similar to the lichess BOT account that is shown in this youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_05I1UpCG8

In Lichess the BOT is called "EtaBetaIta" (very similar name of the PlayChess account), and we can confirm it is his account because of the title of the youtube video and the name of the channel.

This is literally ridiculous and shows how desperate he is to just show off fake ratings and try to lie to everyone lol.

Never seen something similar.

[Eduard Nemeth]

He is cheating with his own account, as you can see the name of the account is very similar to the lichess BOT account that is shown in this youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_05I1UpCG8

In Lichess the BOT is called "EtaBetaIta" (very similar name of the PlayChess account), and we can confirm it is his account because of the title of the youtube video and the name of the channel.

This is literally ridiculous and shows how desperate he is to just show off fake ratings and try to lie to everyone lol.

Never seen something similar.

Thank You!

Sad.