IvanHoe57a2JR

Discussion about chess-playing software (engines, hosts, opening books, platforms, etc...)
Post Reply
vanny
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:34 pm
Real Name: vanny gold

IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by vanny » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:52 pm


Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:23 am

Thanks!

Question: What is here the difference between "JR" Ivanhoe-Version v57 to another V57 versions?

ED.
Peace be with you!

BTO7
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:21 am

Re: IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by BTO7 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:20 am

Eduard Nemeth wrote:
Thanks!

Question: What is here the difference between "JR" Ivanhoe-Version v57 to another V57 versions?

ED.
Ed they are mostly different compilers. JR compiled this 57 version.

Regards
BT

Tomcass
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:24 am

Re: IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by Tomcass » Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:00 pm

This is one of the strongest versions of Ivan I have ever tested. I will post my tests in some hours time. JR has compiled an excellent version.

Regards from Barcelona.

Tom.

jeandis
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:53 pm

Re: IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by jeandis » Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:22 pm

yes this engine is good but it did not read the triplebases, it is a pity

User avatar
xshat
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:44 am

Re: IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by xshat » Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:36 am

It is strong but not the best IvanHoe. Here is a good draw game where Fire gains a huge advantage and is about to win, but then when Ivan's lone rook threatens to draw the battle evaporates.
White = Fire 1.31ns
Black = IvanHoe57a2jr
[White "Fire_131_w32_NS"]
[Black "IvanHoe_57a2_w32_JR"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Opening "Owen Defence"]
[Variation "3.Bd3 e6 4.Nf3 c5"]


1. e4 Nc6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 e6 4. Nf3 Nge7 5. Be3 Nf5 6. Bd3 Be7 7. Qd2 Nxe3
8. Qxe3 Nb4 9. O-O Nxd3 10. cxd3 b6 11. h3 O-O 12. Nc3 c5 13. Rac1 Bb7 14.
Qf4 Qd7 15. Rfd1 Rac8 16. Qg4 h6 17. Rc2 Qc6 18. Rdc1 Ba6 19. Rd2 Qb7 20.
a3 c4 21. Qg3 b5 22. dxc4 bxc4 23. Nh2 Rb8 24. Ng4 Kh8 25. f4 Qd7 26. Ne3
Rb3 27. f5 Rfb8 28. f6 gxf6 29. Qf4 Bf8 30. Qxf6+ Bg7 31. Qf2 h5 32. Re1
Kg8 33. Ree2 Qe7 34. Qg3 Bb5 35. Rf2 Be8 36. Rc2 Kh7 37. Rce2 Bh6 38. Rf6
Bg7 39. Qh4 Kg8 40. Ned1 Bc6 41. Qg3 h4 42. Qxh4 Kf8 43. Re3 Ke8 44. Rg3
Bxf6 45. exf6 Qb7 46. Rg8+ Kd7 47. Qh5 Rxg8 48. Qxf7+ Kd8 49. Qxg8+ Be8 50.
Qxe6 Bf7 51. Qd6+ Qd7 52. Qf4 Rb6 53. g4 Ke8 54. h4 Qd6 55. Qxd6 Rxd6 56.
g5 Re6 57. Kf2 Kf8 58. a4 a6 59. Kf3 Bh5+ 60. Kf4 Bxd1 61. Nxd1 Re4+ 62.
Kf5 Rxd4 63. Ne3 Rxh4 64. g6 d4 65. Nxc4 Rh5+ 66. Ke4 d3 67. Kxd3 Rg5 68.
g7+ Kg8 69. Nd2 Rd5+ 70. Ke3 a5 71. Ne4 Rf5 72. b3 Kh7 73. Kd4 Kg8 74. Kd3
Kh7 75. Ke3 Kg8 76. Kd4 Kh7 77. Kc4 Kg8 78. Kc3 Rf3+ 79. Kc2 Rh3 80. Nc5
Kf7 81. Nb7 Rh2+ 82. Kc3 Rg2 83. Nxa5 Kxf6 84. Kc4 Ke6 85. Nc6 Rxg7 86.
Nd4+ Kd7 87. b4 Rg4 88. Kc5 Kc7 89. a5 Rg5+ 90. Kc4 Rh5 91. Ne6+ Kd6 92.
Nc5 Rh4+ 93. Kb5 Kc7 94. Nb3 Rh5+ 95. Ka4 Rh4 96. Nd2 Kc6 97. Nb1 Rh3 98.
Na3 Rh1 99. b5+ Kc5 100. a6 Rh4+ 101. Ka5 Rh3 102. Nc2 Rc3 103. a7 Rxc2
104. Ka6 Ra2+ 105. Kb7 Kxb5 106. a8=Q Rxa8 107. Kxa8 {Insufficient
material} 1/2-1/2

Zherkovv
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:12 am

Re: IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by Zherkovv » Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:33 am

[quote="xshat"]It is strong but not the best IvanHoe.

What is the best IvanHoe?

User avatar
xshat
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:44 am

Re: IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by xshat » Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:48 am

Zherkovv wrote:
xshat wrote:It is strong but not the best IvanHoe.

What is the best IvanHoe?
From my test results its a tie between T63C and 63mod5a these compiles beat all 57s so far.

User avatar
xshat
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:44 am

Re: IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by xshat » Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:50 am


Zherkovv
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:12 am

Re: IvanHoe57a2JR

Post by Zherkovv » Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:47 am

xshat wrote:
Zherkovv wrote:
xshat wrote:It is strong but not the best IvanHoe.

What is the best IvanHoe?
From my test results its a tie between T63C and 63mod5a these compiles beat all 57s so far.



Thank you very much.

Post Reply