reverse engineering
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:53 am
reverse engineering
how hard is it to reverse engineer?
why haven't fritz, hiarcs, and shredder been reverse engineered like rybka? strong parts of the different codes can be mixed together to produce a more complete engine.
why haven't fritz, hiarcs, and shredder been reverse engineered like rybka? strong parts of the different codes can be mixed together to produce a more complete engine.
Re: reverse engineering
Actually, there were rumors that different parts of the clones were taken from de-compilation of different engines, making them Frankensteins.
- kingliveson
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
- Real Name: Franklin Titus
- Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W
Re: reverse engineering
Not true, Rybka had Fruit source code readily available to copy so it was not reverse engineering.Ovyron wrote:Actually, there were rumors that different parts of the clones were taken from de-compilation of different engines, making them Frankensteins.
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
Re: reverse engineering
Is not easy, requires understanding of the subject being RE, and good programming skills (mostly in assembly). Some applications have made it easier, but still not trivial.brownsmith89 wrote:how hard is it to reverse engineer?
They probably have been.brownsmith89 wrote:why haven't fritz, hiarcs, and shredder been reverse engineered like rybka? strong parts of the different codes can be mixed together to produce a more complete engine.
Re: reverse engineering
Any proof that the clones don't contain Shredder code?kingliveson wrote:Not trueOvyron wrote:Actually, there were rumors that different parts of the clones were taken from de-compilation of different engines, making them Frankensteins.
- kingliveson
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
- Real Name: Franklin Titus
- Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W
Re: reverse engineering
I wouldn't know if Rybka contains Shredder code or not. But we know it contains Fruit code.Ovyron wrote:Any proof that the clones don't contain Shredder code?kingliveson wrote:Not true, Rybka had Fruit source code readily available to copy so it was not reverse engineering.Ovyron wrote:Actually, there were rumors that different parts of the clones were taken from de-compilation of different engines, making them Frankensteins.
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
Re: reverse engineering
I'm not talking about Rybka, I'm talking about the clones.
There was evidence that Ippolit did, as in, a long patch of moves where the evaluation score followed Shredder's score exactly, but nobody has disassembled Shredder to take a look for similarities.
There was evidence that Ippolit did, as in, a long patch of moves where the evaluation score followed Shredder's score exactly, but nobody has disassembled Shredder to take a look for similarities.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:53 am
Re: reverse engineering
i guess you're right. it makes more sense that robbolito is a combination of codes that was able to beat rybka 3, instead of the notion that rybka 4 beta was stolen.64x wrote:They probably have been.
i kept hearing about rybka clones and nothing about the other commercial engines, so i was ignorant.
Re: reverse engineering
Please note that I am not referring to any particular engine, either been cloned or been a clone.
I only say that any engine can be target of RE, and that the _IDEAS_ obtained can be (or have been) implemented in _ANY_ other engine.
That could have happened many times and since a long time ago.
I only say that any engine can be target of RE, and that the _IDEAS_ obtained can be (or have been) implemented in _ANY_ other engine.
That could have happened many times and since a long time ago.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:53 am
Re: reverse engineering
can u link to the thread about this?Ovyron wrote:There was evidence that Ippolit did, as in, a long patch of moves where the evaluation score followed Shredder's score exactly