You are overlooking the definition as it applies to software. A derivative is a fork usually produced by another entity. Rybka 3 to Rybka 4 does not fit this description, IPPOLIT to RobboLito to Igorrit to IvanHoe do not fit this description, Windows Longhorn to Blackcomb/Vienna does not fit this decription, etc. Not sure how else it can be said...Uly wrote:I wouldn't call Houdini 1.0 and RobboLito "distinct pieces of software". See? It's all about semantics, and I doubt you'll have luck making people call all these engines Ippolit (even if it's more correct to call them Ippolit than Ippolit derivatives or something).kingliveson wrote:In software engineering, a project fork happens when developers take a legal copy of source code from one software package and start independent development on it, creating a distinct piece of software.
IPPOLIT
- kingliveson
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
- Real Name: Franklin Titus
- Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W
Re: IPPOLIT
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
Re: IPPOLIT
I would keep the definitions of derivative and fork separated. That is my personal choice, as saying "RobboLito IS Ippolit" makes as much sense to me as saying "Rybka 4 IS Rybka 3", since, they're different programs.