IvanHoe XX.XX.XX

[robbolito]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 Q- 750 @2.67 GHz 6.00 GB Memory
Windows 7.x64 Professional (Build 7600)
Fritz Benchmarks:
Speed:16.84
KNS: 8082
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Hash: 256
Book: Balanced 16-10 moves
TB, RB and GTB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Time: 5 min.
I5 tournament 2011

Code: Select all

                                          1                                 2                                 3                                 4                                 
1   Houdini 2.0 Pro x64       3195   +80  21.0 - 12.020.0 - 13.020.5 - 12.5**     61.5/99
2   Critter 1.2 64-bit SSE4   3190    -8  12.0 - 21.018.0 - 15.018.0 - 15.0 **    48.0/99
3   Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64  3190   -23  13.0 - 20.015.0 - 18.017.5 - 14.5  **   45.5/98
4   IvanHoe 0B.09.18 x64b     3190   -48  12.5 - 20.515.0 - 18.014.5 - 17.5   **  42.0/98

In one game between IvanHoe and Rybka GUI could not open the Rybka engine so no score exists.

[robbolito]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 Q- 960 3.20 GHz8x @ 4.00 GHz 18.00 MB Memory
Windows 7 Professional (Build 7600)
Fritz Benchmarks:
Speed: 24.89
KNS: 11946
GUI: CB- Rybka 3
Hash: 256
Book: Balanced 16- 10 moves
GTB and RB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:5' 0

Code: Select all

1   Houdini 1.5a x64       3195  +9/-8/=33 51.00%   25.5/50
2   IvanHoe 0B.09.18 x64a  3190  +8/-9/=33 49.00%   24.5/50

[robbolito]

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz4x @3.5 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP.x64 Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 20.90
KNS: 10032
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Balanced 16-10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and GTB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:5' 0

Code: Select all

1   Houdini 1.5a x64       3195  +14/-9/=22 55.56%   25.0/45
2   IvanHoe 0B.09.18 x64a  3190  +9/-14/=22 44.44%   20.0/45

[kingliveson]

robbolito, the reason I wanted to see version a against Houdini is because it evaluates well. Since version b was trashed in 15+10 time control, I am curious to see how a does.

[robbolito]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 Q- 870@ 2.93 GHz 8.00 MB RAM
Windows 7.x64 Home Premium
Fritz Benchmarks:
Speed: 19.22
KNS: 9225
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Hash: 256
Book: Balanced 16-10 moves
RB and GTB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:5' 0

Code: Select all

1   Houdini 1.5a x64       3190  +19/-8/=23 61.00%   30.5/50
2   IvanHoe 0B.09.18 x64b  3190  +8/-19/=23 39.00%   19.5/50

[robbolito]

AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor x6 @3.80 GHz 8.00 MB Memory
Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 28.33
KNS: 13599
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Balanced 16-10 moves
Hash: 512
GTB and RB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:5' 0

Code: Select all

1   Houdini 1.5a x64       3195  +14/-6/=30 58.00%   29.0/50
2   IvanHoe 0B.09.18 x64a  3190  +6/-14/=30 42.00%   21.0/50

[kingliveson]

Thanks for the tests...Another strength of Houdini is how it handles fail-lows/highs.

[robbolito]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 Q- 750 @2.67 GHz 6.00 GB Memory
Windows 7.x64 Professional (Build 7600)
Fritz Benchmarks:
Speed:16.84
KNS: 8082
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Hash: 256
Book: Balanced 16-10 moves
RB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:5' 0

Code: Select all

1   Stockfish VE_01 64bit  3190  +12/-11/=27 51.00%   25.5/50
2   IvanHoe 0B.09.18 x64b  3190  +11/-12/=27 49.00%   24.5/50

[robbolito]

AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor x6 @3.80 GHz 8.00 MB Memory
Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 28.33
KNS: 13599
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Balanced 16-10 moves
Hash: 512
GTB and RB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:5' 0

Code: Select all

1   Houdini 1.5a x64       3195  +16/-11/=23 55.00%   27.5/50
2   IvanHoe 0B.09.18 x64b  3190  +11/-16/=23 45.00%   22.5/50