3000 elo in comp v comp games but on Playchess in main room v Humans it is almost 3500 elo. PF4 got a 2931 rating in the GM tournament it played in and that is over a year ago.kingliveson wrote:Harvey Williamson wrote:I would take the challenge with my iPhome 4 + Hiarcs.kingliveson wrote:Depends on hardware.Harvey Williamson wrote:There are 3 Humans with elo above 2800. I would bet that Fritz and Shredder would destroy them all in a match.stvs wrote: would we have better engines than 2800 elo level fritz and shredder ?Harvey Williamson wrote:I guess for the engine players there is no CTG support?
1 GHz (?) CPU combined with ~3000+ Elo program shouldn't pose too much of a problem for GMs like Carlsen, Nakamura, Anand, etc...
the "clones" issue for a user point of view
- Harvey Williamson
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:10 pm
Re: the "clones" issue for a user point of view
- kingliveson
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
- Real Name: Franklin Titus
- Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W
Re: the "clones" issue for a user point of view
I bet the hardware is not quite what is described above. Not only that, there's also opening books I presume.Harvey Williamson wrote:3000 elo in comp v comp games but on Playchess in main room v Humans it is almost 3500 elo. PF4 got a 2931 rating in the GM tournament it played in and that is over a year ago.kingliveson wrote:Harvey Williamson wrote:I would take the challenge with my iPhome 4 + Hiarcs.kingliveson wrote:Depends on hardware.Harvey Williamson wrote:There are 3 Humans with elo above 2800. I would bet that Fritz and Shredder would destroy them all in a match.stvs wrote: would we have better engines than 2800 elo level fritz and shredder ?Harvey Williamson wrote:I guess for the engine players there is no CTG support?
1 GHz (?) CPU combined with ~3000+ Elo program shouldn't pose too much of a problem for GMs like Carlsen, Nakamura, Anand, etc...
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
- Harvey Williamson
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:10 pm
Re: the "clones" issue for a user point of view
The same opening book could be used for the iPhone although on Playchess I usually make the book play some weird stuff. i set it to Surprise!kingliveson wrote:I bet the hardware is not quite what is described above. Not only that, there's also opening books I presume.Harvey Williamson wrote:3000 elo in comp v comp games but on Playchess in main room v Humans it is almost 3500 elo. PF4 got a 2931 rating in the GM tournament it played in and that is over a year ago.kingliveson wrote:Harvey Williamson wrote:I would take the challenge with my iPhome 4 + Hiarcs.kingliveson wrote:Depends on hardware.Harvey Williamson wrote:There are 3 Humans with elo above 2800. I would bet that Fritz and Shredder would destroy them all in a match.stvs wrote: would we have better engines than 2800 elo level fritz and shredder ?Harvey Williamson wrote:I guess for the engine players there is no CTG support?
1 GHz (?) CPU combined with ~3000+ Elo program shouldn't pose too much of a problem for GMs like Carlsen, Nakamura, Anand, etc...
- kingliveson
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
- Real Name: Franklin Titus
- Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W
Re: the "clones" issue for a user point of view
Opening books and tablebases makes it unfair, because humans are not allowed such access. Anyways, I doubt any top GM would take the challenge without a major sponsor.Harvey Williamson wrote:The same opening book could be used for the iPhone although on Playchess I usually make the book play some weird stuff. i set it to Surprise!kingliveson wrote:I bet the hardware is not quite what is described above. Not only that, there's also opening books I presume.Harvey Williamson wrote:3000 elo in comp v comp games but on Playchess in main room v Humans it is almost 3500 elo. PF4 got a 2931 rating in the GM tournament it played in and that is over a year ago.kingliveson wrote:Harvey Williamson wrote:I would take the challenge with my iPhome 4 + Hiarcs.kingliveson wrote:Depends on hardware.Harvey Williamson wrote:There are 3 Humans with elo above 2800. I would bet that Fritz and Shredder would destroy them all in a match.stvs wrote: would we have better engines than 2800 elo level fritz and shredder ?Harvey Williamson wrote:I guess for the engine players there is no CTG support?
1 GHz (?) CPU combined with ~3000+ Elo program shouldn't pose too much of a problem for GMs like Carlsen, Nakamura, Anand, etc...
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
- Harvey Williamson
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:10 pm
Re: the "clones" issue for a user point of view
Has a match ever been played against a computer with no book and a Top GM? I do not remember one. No tbs yet on the iPhone. However the GM can have access to a book of his choice for the match.kingliveson wrote:Opening books and tablebases makes it unfair, because humans are not allowed such access. Anyways, I doubt any top GM would take the challenge without a major sponsor.Harvey Williamson wrote:The same opening book could be used for the iPhone although on Playchess I usually make the book play some weird stuff. i set it to Surprise!kingliveson wrote:I bet the hardware is not quite what is described above. Not only that, there's also opening books I presume.Harvey Williamson wrote:3000 elo in comp v comp games but on Playchess in main room v Humans it is almost 3500 elo. PF4 got a 2931 rating in the GM tournament it played in and that is over a year ago.kingliveson wrote:Harvey Williamson wrote:I would take the challenge with my iPhome 4 + Hiarcs.kingliveson wrote:Depends on hardware.Harvey Williamson wrote:There are 3 Humans with elo above 2800. I would bet that Fritz and Shredder would destroy them all in a match.stvs wrote: would we have better engines than 2800 elo level fritz and shredder ?Harvey Williamson wrote:I guess for the engine players there is no CTG support?
1 GHz (?) CPU combined with ~3000+ Elo program shouldn't pose too much of a problem for GMs like Carlsen, Nakamura, Anand, etc...