Why I am here

[LiquidNitrogen]

And I'm here to read why Nelson Hernandez wants to read about why other people want to be here.

Actually, I'm tired of the censorship on other forums.

Peter

I should have said "I am here to talk about Bobby Fischer's new book"

[mariaclara]

same here.

And I'm here to read why Nelson Hernandez wants to read about why other people want to be here.
Actually, I'm tired of the censorship on other forums.
Peter

OT:

btw,

what's all that "grassy knoll kill shot " thingy?

ty

[Dayffd]

same here.

And I'm here to read why Nelson Hernandez wants to read about why other people want to be here.
Actually, I'm tired of the censorship on other forums.
Peter

OT:

btw,

what's all that "grassy knoll kill shot " thingy?

ty

President Kennedy's assasination. There were claims that there was at least one other gunman on or behind a grassy knoll in relative close proximity who also fired. IIRC the "evidence" was some film that seemed to show some smoke from a weapon having been fired at the time in that area and from the audio apparently an echo or other gunshot coming from that area. There have been a lot of claims concerning the assasination involving the Soviet secret police, Cuba, mafia, and maybe more.

[Nelson Hernandez]

Peter: first priority, to scarf up whatever GAMES people post. Second priority, far behind: to learn things I don't already know. Like, for instance, to learn Kennedy's true assassin(s).

[orgfert]

He's so full of himself and he actually believes that his moderation is perfect.

If your statement was true, Graham Banks wouldn't have apologized.

[LiquidNitrogen]

He's so full of himself and he actually believes that his moderation is perfect.

If your statement was true, Graham Banks wouldn't have apologized.

If you were correct, I would agree with you.

Was he apologizing for being full of himself, or for being a lousy moderator?

[orgfert]

He's so full of himself and he actually believes that his moderation is perfect.

If your statement was true, Graham Banks wouldn't have apologized.

If you were correct, I would agree with you.

Was he apologizing for being full of himself, or for being a lousy moderator?

He apologized for his error in interpreting the recent guidance that was the cause of this forum coming into existence. If he thought his moderation as perfect, he wouldn't have apologized. This means your declaration is falsified.

[LiquidNitrogen]

He's so full of himself and he actually believes that his moderation is perfect.

If your statement was true, Graham Banks wouldn't have apologized.

If you were correct, I would agree with you.

Was he apologizing for being full of himself, or for being a lousy moderator?

He apologized for his error in interpreting the recent guidance that was the cause of this forum coming into existence. If he thought his moderation as perfect, he wouldn't have apologized. This means your declaration is falsified.

Then he was a lousy moderator, and I am correct.

[orgfert]

He's so full of himself and he actually believes that his moderation is perfect.

If your statement was true, Graham Banks wouldn't have apologized.

If you were correct, I would agree with you.

Was he apologizing for being full of himself, or for being a lousy moderator?

He apologized for his error in interpreting the recent guidance that was the cause of this forum coming into existence. If he thought his moderation as perfect, he wouldn't have apologized. This means your declaration is falsified.

Then he was a lousy moderator, and I am correct.

I will not argue that particular point. But declaring he thinks his moderation perfect was an error on your part, you must admit (not to put too fine a point on it). You experienced a lapse of logic in that instance.

[BB+]

Like, for instance, to learn Kennedy's true assassin(s).

Remind me what the rôle of secret agent Henry Rybka was?

EDIT: If we try hard enough, we can get a link like this to be #1 in a "rybka forum" search:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index ... topic=7063