Page 1 of 3
IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:07 pm
by kingliveson
IvanHoe 999948i beta Linux and Windows 32/64 bit builds compressed with latest 7zip archiver are available at
http://chess.cygnitec.com/engine/ivanhoe/.
Re: IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:30 pm
by kingliveson
Small sample:
IvanHoe vs Houdini, Blitz 1m
1 Houdini 1.5 x64 +78 +21/=19/-10 61.00% 30.5/50
2 IvanHoe 9.48b x64 -78 +10/=19/-21 39.00% 19.5/50
Re: IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:38 pm
by John Doe
Bad compile!
1+1 match
1. Ivanhoe B48iA x64 2-cpu 177.0/300
2. IvanHoe 9.48b x64 2-cpu 123.0/300
Re: IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:10 pm
by kingliveson
John Doe wrote:Bad compile!
1+1 match
1. Ivanhoe B48iA x64 2-cpu 177.0/300
2. IvanHoe 9.48b x64 2-cpu 123.0/300
Thanks for these -- will look into it. Also discovered a booboo in the Linux builds...Updates ahead!
Re: IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 1:45 pm
by kingliveson
Files rebuilt and uploaded (Windows Game Mode only and Linux Game and Analysis Mode) -- link in first post. Not good for hyper speed, but does Ok in bullets.
Re: IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:44 pm
by John Doe
kingliveson wrote:Files rebuilt and uploaded (Windows Game Mode only and Linux Game and Analysis Mode) -- link in first post. Not good for hyper speed, but does Ok in bullets.
1+0
still worse than Peterpan's
Code: Select all
1. IvanHoe 9.48b x64 new 2-cpu 90.5/200
2. Ivanhoe B48iAx64 2-cpu 109.5/200
Re: IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:05 pm
by kingliveson
John Doe wrote:kingliveson wrote:Files rebuilt and uploaded (Windows Game Mode only and Linux Game and Analysis Mode) -- link in first post. Not good for hyper speed, but does Ok in bullets.
1+0
still worse than Peterpan's
Code: Select all
1. IvanHoe 9.48b x64 new 2-cpu 90.5/200
2. Ivanhoe B48iAx64 2-cpu 109.5/200
PeterPan does a fine job with his builds so am not surprised. I did 100 games with the above builds and there was only 1 game separating the two, probably should have ran it longer. Here is another
test vs Rybka and Houdini.
Anycase, version 999948n build Windows only is attached.
Re: IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:18 am
by Prima
Kingliveson, as others have noted too, though your build may not be as strong, it complies with all GUIs. For me, I value this stability and compliance with all GUI-environment over speed or strength. So thank you the compiles.
Re: IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 8:10 pm
by robbolito
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz 8.0 GB Memory
Windows 7 Home Premium Edition (Build 7600) 64 bit
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 13.09
KNS: 6280
GUI: Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2010-10 moves
Hash:256
TB and GTB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz: 10.0
Code: Select all
1 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3190 +6/-3/=11 57.50% 11.5/20
2 IvanHoe 9.48b x64nKLO 3190 +3/-6/=11 42.50% 8.5/20
Re: IvanHoe 999948 Beta
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:33 am
by Prima
I have to admit I haven't been using IvanHoes with the newer Robbobases scheme since their release. I have downloaded them though and read the UCI parameter settings for the newer IvanHoes. The writer for the IvanHoe UCI parameters does not explain it well enough. My Robbobases are in the c drive and named RTrB-3-4-5 & RToB-3-4-5.
My question is, what are the meaning of these Robbobases parameters in the newer IvanHoes;
RobboTripleBulkLoadThisDirectory=NULL <--- do I put only the drive letter here, as in: c:\?
RobboTripleBulkLoadThisName=NULL <---do I put the folder name of my RobboTripleBase here, as in: RTrB-3-4-5?
RobboTripleBulkDetachThisDirectory=NULL
RobboTripleBulkDetachThisName=NULL
Any help from anyone having success with this Robboabases setup is appreciated. Thanks.