Polyglot adapter should speak to xboard-engines, too

[qwertologe]

>If you can save time by using some existing piece of software (like Polyglot) that happens to do the job,
>albeit in an intrinsically inefficient and cumbersome way, power to you!

How will you judge in such a way over my work?

>But now you want something that doesn't seem to exist, and
>want others to do your job for you in a way that would take much more effort.

I asked polite - sorry for inconvenience.

>That seems globally counter-productive,

Your opinion, you are right to think so.

>and I doubt that there will be any takers.

I agree.

>If you want to use Polyglot as a book engine, you can run it in parallel to the real engine, ...

Good idea, thanks.