STS comparison of IPPOLIT, Rybka 3 and Stockfish
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1226
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:49 am
- Real Name: Jeremy Bernstein
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Contact:
STS comparison of IPPOLIT, Rybka 3 and Stockfish
Attached to this post is a PDF summary of Strategic Test Suite (http://sites.google.com/site/strategictestsuite/) results from IPPOLIT, Rybka 3 and Stockfish. My initial idea was to attempt to demonstrate that IPPOLIT and Rybka 3 have similar weaknesses via the suite, using Stockfish 1.7.1 as a 'control'. The results are far from conclusive, which is to say, I can't identify any correspondences between IPPOLIT and Rybka based on time spent or inability to solve certain positions. I've marked wrong answers in blue and "hard problems" (> 10 seconds of thinking) in orange. All engines were 1-core, 32-bit. Each engine had up to 420 seconds to solve each problem.
Jeremy
Jeremy
Re: STS comparison of IPPOLIT, Rybka 3 and Stockfish
An EXELLENT post
Nothing is ever truly lost , just miss placed and awaiting us
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:39 am
- Real Name: Martin Wyngaarden
- Location: Holland, Michigan
Re: STS comparison of IPPOLIT, Rybka 3 and Stockfish
When only looking at move choice, there seemed to be significant correlations between the Ippos and Rybka. I saw an analysis by Miguel on CCC and it left me with little doubt that the two play markedly similar moves. I can't speak to the origins of Ippo, or the code, but as far as playing style goes... the two are incredibly close.Jeremy Bernstein wrote:Attached to this post is a PDF summary of Strategic Test Suite (http://sites.google.com/site/strategictestsuite/) results from IPPOLIT, Rybka 3 and Stockfish. My initial idea was to attempt to demonstrate that IPPOLIT and Rybka 3 have similar weaknesses via the suite, using Stockfish 1.7.1 as a 'control'. The results are far from conclusive, which is to say, I can't identify any correspondences between IPPOLIT and Rybka based on time spent or inability to solve certain positions. I've marked wrong answers in blue and "hard problems" (> 10 seconds of thinking) in orange. All engines were 1-core, 32-bit. Each engine had up to 420 seconds to solve each problem.
Jeremy
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1226
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:49 am
- Real Name: Jeremy Bernstein
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Contact:
Re: STS comparison of IPPOLIT, Rybka 3 and Stockfish
The next batch I'll hit is a 3-way comparison of IPPOLIT, RobboLito and Houdini. I'm mostly just curious about how well STS works as a relationship indicator.
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:48 am
Re: STS comparison of IPPOLIT, Rybka 3 and Stockfish
C'mon Richard, lets throw some good your idea on the table don't just ask for other'sRichard Vida wrote:BTW, what happened with the material Zach Wegner mentioned in this post?
P.S: Take with a bit of joking, not too serious, I say this because from the few posts where you expressed some idea/suggestion I've made up my mind you have a good vision of how an engine works.
- kingliveson
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
- Real Name: Franklin Titus
- Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W
Re: STS comparison of IPPOLIT, Rybka 3 and Stockfish
It's in a hidden forum.
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen