Page 1 of 3
Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:02 am
by gaard
Conditions:
Ponder=off
4" per move which is roughly equivalent to CCRL 40/4 when hardware is accounted for, only time management is precluded.
Nalimov 3-4-5 EGTB's
Fast 345 Shredderbases
30 positions at 12 move deep repeated with colors switched.
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Houdini_x64_1CPU 109 27 26 360 69% -18 36%
2 Deep Rybka 4 x64 106 27 26 360 68% -18 36%
3 Stockfish-171-64-ja 44 26 26 360 58% -7 39%
4 Naum 4.2 -6 26 26 360 48% 1 39%
5 Shredder 12 -45 26 27 360 43% 8 33%
6 Spark-0.4-win64-mp -96 27 27 360 34% 16 33%
7 Zappa Mexico II x64 -113 27 27 360 31% 19 33%
Up next... endgame performance statistics including IvanHoe 63 with TripleBases.
Re: Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:10 am
by gaard
Code: Select all
1 Houdini_x64_1CPU 109 360.0 (247.0 : 113.0)
60.0 ( 31.0 : 29.0) Deep Rybka 4 x64 106
60.0 ( 38.5 : 21.5) Stockfish-171-64-ja 44
60.0 ( 41.0 : 19.0) Naum -6
60.0 ( 44.0 : 16.0) Ds12 -45
60.0 ( 47.0 : 13.0) Spark-0.4-win64-mp -96
60.0 ( 45.5 : 14.5) Zappa Mexico II x64 -113
2 Deep Rybka 4 x64 106 360.0 (244.5 : 115.5)
60.0 ( 29.0 : 31.0) Houdini_x64_1CPU 109
60.0 ( 39.0 : 21.0) Stockfish-171-64-ja 44
60.0 ( 42.5 : 17.5) Naum -6
60.0 ( 38.5 : 21.5) Ds12 -45
60.0 ( 46.0 : 14.0) Spark-0.4-win64-mp -96
60.0 ( 49.5 : 10.5) Zappa Mexico II x64 -113
3 Stockfish-171-64-ja 44 360.0 (207.5 : 152.5)
60.0 ( 21.5 : 38.5) Houdini_x64_1CPU 109
60.0 ( 21.0 : 39.0) Deep Rybka 4 x64 106
60.0 ( 34.5 : 25.5) Naum -6
60.0 ( 37.5 : 22.5) Ds12 -45
60.0 ( 46.0 : 14.0) Spark-0.4-win64-mp -96
60.0 ( 47.0 : 13.0) Zappa Mexico II x64 -113
4 Naum -6 360.0 (174.5 : 185.5)
60.0 ( 19.0 : 41.0) Houdini_x64_1CPU 109
60.0 ( 17.5 : 42.5) Deep Rybka 4 x64 106
60.0 ( 25.5 : 34.5) Stockfish-171-64-ja 44
60.0 ( 38.5 : 21.5) Ds12 -45
60.0 ( 37.5 : 22.5) Spark-0.4-win64-mp -96
60.0 ( 36.5 : 23.5) Zappa Mexico II x64 -113
5 Ds12 -45 360.0 (153.0 : 207.0)
60.0 ( 16.0 : 44.0) Houdini_x64_1CPU 109
60.0 ( 21.5 : 38.5) Deep Rybka 4 x64 106
60.0 ( 22.5 : 37.5) Stockfish-171-64-ja 44
60.0 ( 21.5 : 38.5) Naum -6
60.0 ( 33.5 : 26.5) Spark-0.4-win64-mp -96
60.0 ( 38.0 : 22.0) Zappa Mexico II x64 -113
6 Spark-0.4-win64-mp -96 360.0 (121.5 : 238.5)
60.0 ( 13.0 : 47.0) Houdini_x64_1CPU 109
60.0 ( 14.0 : 46.0) Deep Rybka 4 x64 106
60.0 ( 14.0 : 46.0) Stockfish-171-64-ja 44
60.0 ( 22.5 : 37.5) Naum -6
60.0 ( 26.5 : 33.5) Ds12 -45
60.0 ( 31.5 : 28.5) Zappa Mexico II x64 -113
7 Zappa Mexico II x64 -113 360.0 (112.0 : 248.0)
60.0 ( 14.5 : 45.5) Houdini_x64_1CPU 109
60.0 ( 10.5 : 49.5) Deep Rybka 4 x64 106
60.0 ( 13.0 : 47.0) Stockfish-171-64-ja 44
60.0 ( 23.5 : 36.5) Naum -6
60.0 ( 22.0 : 38.0) Ds12 -45
60.0 ( 28.5 : 31.5) Spark-0.4-win64-mp -96
Re: Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:48 pm
by gaard
To get a better idea of the scaling of Houdini 1.01, I am playing it against the same 6 opponents with the same condition. Initial results are not promising, but there are still many more games to be played.
Could anybody guess how H1.01 lost this one to DR4? Tablebases would have helped somewhat, but I think the game was lost before they would come into play.
[Event "HOUD4S"]
[Site "MARTIN-EKOEWKAL"]
[Date "2010.06.10"]
[Round "12"]
[White "Deep Rybka 4 x64"]
[Black "Houdini_x64_4CPU 4CPU"]
[Result "1-0"]
[BlackElo "2200"]
[ECO "C48"]
[Opening "Four Knights"]
[Time "14:05:19"]
[Variation "Rubinstein, 5.Ba4 Nxf3+"]
[WhiteElo "2200"]
[TimeControl "0+4"]
[Termination "adjudication"]
[PlyCount "165"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bb5 Nd4 5. Ba4 c6 6. d3 Nxf3+ 7. Qxf3 d6
8. O-O Be7 9. Nd5 h6 10. c3 Be6 11. Nxe7 Qxe7 12. Qe2 g5 13. Bc2 {+0.38/11
4} O-O-O {-0.33/16 4} 14. a4 {+0.42/13 4} Kb8 {-0.33/16 4} 15. b4 {+0.47/13
4} Nd7 {-0.34/17 4} 16. a5 {+0.52/13 3} Nf8 {-0.36/18 4} 17. a6 {+0.57/12
4} b6 {-0.28/16 4} 18. Ba4 {+0.54/13 3} Rc8 {-0.18/17 4} 19. c4 {+0.41/12
4} Ng6 {-0.18/16 4} 20. Bb2 {+0.43/12 4} f6 {-0.15/16 4} 21. Qe3 {+0.33/11
4} h5 {-0.10/16 4} 22. c5 {+0.40/14 4} b5 {-0.10/19 4} 23. Bc2 {+0.39/15 4}
dxc5 {-0.07/19 4} 24. bxc5 {+0.39/15 4} Nf4 {-0.06/19 4} 25. Rfd1 {+0.36/13
4} Rcd8 {-0.10/17 4} 26. Kh1 {+0.37/13 3} h4 {-0.05/17 4} 27. d4 {+0.33/13
4} Bc8 {-0.05/15 4} 28. dxe5 {+0.71/10 4} fxe5 {-0.16/18 4} 29. Qc3
{+0.59/11 4} Rxd1+ {-0.21/19 4} 30. Rxd1 {+0.73/11 4} Re8 {-0.15/20 4} 31.
Rd6 {+0.55/12 4} Bxa6 {-0.21/18 4} 32. Rxc6 {+0.77/14 4} Qb7 {-0.24/19 4}
33. Rh6 {+1.05/12 4} b4 {-0.24/18 4} 34. Qxe5+ {+0.90/13 4} Rxe5 {-0.22/20
4} 35. Bxe5+ {+0.75/14 4} Kc8 {-0.21/20 4} 36. c6 {+0.83/15 4} Qe7
{-0.19/19 4} 37. Rh8+ {+0.85/13 4} Qd8 {-0.18/19 4} 38. Rxd8+ {+0.85/13 3}
Kxd8 {-0.16/18 4} 39. Bf6+ {+0.88/15 4} Kc7 {-0.10/19 4} 40. Bxg5 {+0.88/14
3} Nd3 {-0.12/19 4} 41. Bxh4 {+0.89/14 4} Bc4 {-0.15/17 4} 42. Ba4
{+0.93/15 4} Nb2 {0.00/19 4} 43. Bg3+ {+0.81/15 4} Kc8 {0.00/24 4} 44. Bc2
{+0.24/16 4} Bd3 {0.00/22 4} 45. Bb3 {+0.49/16 4} Bc4 {0.00/21 4} 46. Be5
{+0.53/17 4} Bxb3 {-0.14/19 4} 47. Bxb2 {+0.65/17 3} Kc7 {-0.19/18 4} 48.
h4 {+0.91/14 4} a5 {-0.16/18 4} 49. Bc1 {+1.23/14 4} Kxc6 {-0.22/16 4} 50.
h5 {+1.29/15 4} a4 {-0.69/15 4} 51. h6 {+2.31/13 4} Bg8 {-0.96/17 4} 52. f4
{+2.43/14 4} a3 {-1.03/15 4} 53. g4 {+2.48/15 4} Kb5 {-0.98/17 4} 54. g5
{+2.60/15 4} Ka4 {-0.52/19 4} 55. g6 {+2.71/14 4} b3 {-0.59/20 4} 56. Bxa3
{+2.83/15 4} Kxa3 {-0.70/22 4} 57. h7 {+2.83/15 4} Bxh7 {-0.74/23 4} 58.
gxh7 {+2.98/15 4} b2 {-0.74/23 4} 59. h8=Q {+2.98/15 4} b1=Q+ {-0.74/23 4}
60. Kh2 {+2.98/15 4} Qc2+ {-0.81/22 4} 61. Kg3 {+3.08/15 4} Qxe4 {-0.81/22
4} 62. Qe5 {+M55/59 1} Qd3+ {-0.81/23 4} 63. Kh4 {+M54/59 1} Qh7+ {-0.81/23
4} 64. Kg5 {+M53/59 1} Qg8+ {-0.81/23 4} 65. Kf6 {+M52/59 1} Qf8+ {-0.84/22
4} 66. Kg6 {+M51/59 1} Qg8+ {-0.92/22 4} 67. Qg7 {+M50/59 1} Qe8+ {-0.91/21
4} 68. Qf7 {+M49/59 1} Qc6+ {-1.05/21 4} 69. Qf6 {+M48/59 1} Qg2+ {-1.19/20
4} 70. Kf7 {+M47/59 1} Kb3 {-1.31/21 4} 71. Qb6+ {+M46/59 1} Kc3 {-1.31/21
4} 72. f5 {+M45/59 1} Qd5+ {-1.40/22 4} 73. Qe6 {+M44/59 1} Qb7+ {-1.40/22
4} 74. Kf8 {+M43/59 1} Qa8+ {-1.52/20 4} 75. Ke7 {+M42/59 1} Qa7+ {-1.52/22
4} 76. Qd7 {+M40/59 1} Qc5+ {-1.60/21 4} 77. Kd8 {+M38/59 1} Kb2 {-1.67/19
4} 78. Qb7+ {+M36/59 1} Ka2 {-2.11/18 3} 79. Qa6+ {+M35/59 1} Kb3 {-3.21/19
4} 80. f6 {+M34/59 1} Qd5+ {-3.22/21 4} 81. Kc7 {+M31/59 1} Qh5 {-3.22/21
4} 82. Qe6+ {+M29/59 1} Ka3 {-3.53/22 4} 83. f7 {+M28/59 1 1-0 User
Adjudication} 1-0
Re: Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:23 pm
by notyetagm
Houdini is so great.
Why buy Rybka 4 when Houdini 1.01 is just as strong and free?
Re: Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 9:03 am
by Aloha
Houdini wins after only 44 moves by the popular defense Najdorf/B90...
Respect!
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2010.06.12"]
[Round "6"]
[White "Houdini 1.01"]
[Black "Deep Rybka 4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B90"]
[PlyCount "64"]
[EventDate "2010.??.??"]
[TimeControl "300+50"]
[WhiteClock "0:00:35"]
[BlackClock "0:00:31"]
{[%t Long] Schwarz gibt auf. (1--0) [%t bLon] Eröffnungsbuch: E2E-12moves} 1.
e4 {0.11/1 0 [%clko 0:04:00]} c5 {0.29/1 0 [%clko 0:04:03]} 2. Nf3 {0.29/1 0
[%clko 0:04:02]} d6 {0.29/1 0 [%clko 0:04:05]} 3. d4 {0.22/1 0 [%clko 0:04:05]}
cxd4 {0.22/1 0 [%clko 0:04:08]} 4. Nxd4 {0.22/1 0 [%clko 0:04:08]} Nf6 {0.22/1
0 [%clko 0:04:11]} 5. Nc3 {0.22/1 0 [%clko 0:04:11]} a6 {0.29/1 0 [%clko 0:04:
14]} 6. Be3 {0.26/1 0 [%clko 0:04:14]} e5 {0.52/1 0 [%clko 0:04:17]} 7. Nb3 {
0.52/1 0 [%clko 0:04:17]} Be6 {0.52/1 0 [%clko 0:04:20]} 8. f3 {0.22/1 0
[%clko 0:04:20]} Be7 {0.22/1 0 [%clko 0:04:23]} 9. Qd2 {0.15/1 0 [%clko 0:04:
23]} O-O {0.00/1 0 [%clko 0:04:26]} 10. O-O-O {0.00/1 0 [%clko 0:04:26]} Nbd7 {
0.00/1 0 [%clko 0:04:29]} 11. g4 {0.00/1 0 [%clko 0:04:29]} b5 {0.00/1 0
[%clko 0:04:32]} 12. g5 {0.00/1 0 [%clko 0:04:32]} Nh5 {0.00/1 0 [%clko 0:04:
35] Weiß ist aus dem Buch} 13. Kb1 {0.03/17 11 [%clko 0:04:00] Schwarz ist aus
dem Buch} Nb6 {0.19/13 11 [%clko 0:03:51]} 14. Nd5 {0.00/16 11 [%clko 0:03:51]}
Nxd5 {0.08/13 10 [%clko 0:03:43]} 15. exd5 {0.00/14 0 [%clko 0:03:44]} Bd7 {0.
08/13 14 [%clko 0:03:45]} 16. Rg1 {-0.01/16 11 [%clko 0:03:32]} Rc8 {0.07/13
14 [%clko 0:03:37]} 17. Bd3 {0.08/17 12 [%clko 0:03:23]} g6 {0.17/12 9 [%clko
0:03:29]} 18. f4 {0.05/16 6 [%clko 0:03:17]} exf4 {0.27/11 20 [%clko 0:03:25]}
19. Bxf4 {0.07/13 0 [%clko 0:03:00]} Nxf4 {0.33/12 14 [%clko 0:03:28]} 20. Qxf4
{0.12/16 2 [%clko 0:02:49]} Qb6 {0.33/12 10 [%clko 0:03:29]} 21. h4 {0.23/16
10 [%clko 0:02:42]} a5 {0.33/12 8 [%clko 0:03:22]} 22. Nd4 {0.25/15 7 [%clko 0:
02:37]} a4 {0.32/11 15 [%clko 0:03:18]} 23. h5 {0.88/15 48 [%clko 0:02:25]} Rc4
{1.07/10 24 [%clko 0:02:33]} 24. Bxc4 {0.90/13 9 [%clko 0:02:04]} bxc4 {1.09/
11 5 [%clko 0:02:27]} 25. c3 {1.26/15 25 [%clko 0:02:01]} a3 {1.37/10 8 [%clko
0:02:05]} 26. Rg2 {1.26/13 0 [%clko 0:01:57]} Qb7 {1.40/10 10 [%clko 0:02:08]}
27. Re2 {1.40/15 6 [%clko 0:01:50] e3 [%clk 0:01:38] [%clko 0:02:05] [%emt 0:
00:16] [%eval 179,10] Z0 [%clk 0:02:04] [%clko 0:01:38] [%emt 0:00:05] [%eval
141,14] Z0 [%clk 0:01:36] [%clko 0:02:04] [%emt 0:00:04] [%eval 191,12] Qxd6
[%clk 0:02:06] [%clko 0:01:36] [%emt 0:00:00] [%eval 141,13]} Bg4 {1.76/12 8
[%clko 0:02:06] Z0 [%clk 0:02:05] [%clko 0:01:30] [%emt 0:00:05] [%eval 139,16]
Re8 [%clk 0:01:27] [%clko 0:02:05] [%emt 0:00:07] [%eval 178,12]} 28. Rf2 {1.
54/16 8 [%clko 0:01:27]} Be6 {1.92/12 5 [%clko 0:01:58]} 29. dxe6 {1.54/14 0
[%clko 0:01:26]} Qe4+ {2.02/12 8 [%clko 0:02:01]} 30. Ka1 {1.71/16 8 [%clko 0:
01:21] Z0 [%clk 0:01:16] [%clko 0:01:58] [%emt 0:00:08] [%eval 202,13] Qxa3
[%clk 0:02:00] [%clko 0:01:16] [%emt 0:00:00] [%eval 171,15]} Qxe6 {2.02/12 8
[%clko 0:02:00] Qa5 [%clk 0:01:58] [%clko 0:01:10] [%emt 0:00:04] [%eval 176,
15]} 31. h6 {2.04/10 6 [%clko 0:01:58] a4 [%clk 0:01:55] [%clko 0:01:08] [%emt
0:00:06] [%eval 190,14] Z0 [%clk 0:01:00] [%clko 0:01:55] [%emt 0:00:10]
[%eval 240,10] Rff1 [%clk 0:01:51] [%clko 0:01:00] [%emt 0:00:07] [%eval 236,
14] Z0 [%clk 0:00:54] [%clko 0:01:51] [%emt 0:00:10] [%eval 240,10] Qb5 [%clk
0:01:50] [%clko 0:00:54] [%emt 0:00:04] [%eval 267,14]} Rc8 {2.68/9 13 [%clko
0:01:50] Rfe1 [%clk 0:01:47] [%clko 0:00:43] [%emt 0:00:05] [%eval 367,15] Qc6
[%clk 0:00:43] [%clko 0:01:47] [%emt 0:00:03] [%eval 371,10] Rd7 [%clk 0:01:50]
[%clko 0:00:43] [%emt 0:00:00] [%eval 367,13] Kf8 [%clk 0:00:42] [%clko 0:01:
50] [%emt 0:00:04] [%eval 398,10] Qb4 [%clk 0:01:52] [%clko 0:00:42] [%emt 0:
00:02] [%eval 394,14] Kg8 [%clk 0:00:37] [%clko 0:01:52] [%emt 0:00:08] [%eval
408,11] Rd6 [%clk 0:01:37] [%clko 0:00:37] [%emt 0:00:18] [%eval 602,16]} 32.
Qf3 {5.40/10 4 [%clko 0:01:37] Qb5 [%clk 0:01:40] [%clko 0:00:35] [%emt 0:00:
00] [%eval 602,15]} Rf8 {5.40/9 7 [%clko 0:01:40] Qxc4+ [%clk 0:01:41] [%clko
0:00:31] [%emt 0:00:02] [%eval 658,14]} 1-0
Re: Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:41 pm
by robbolito
AMD-X6.x64 Blitz:10', Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3175 +5/-4/=21 51.67% 15.5/30
2 Houdini DEVEL-V2 x64 8_CPU 2890 +4/-5/=21 48.33% 14.5/30
Re: Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:14 am
by robbolito
Qi7- 960 XP.x64, Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 Houdini DEVEL-V1 x64 8_CPU 3185 +6/-6/=18 50.00% 15.0/30 225.00
2 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3150 +6/-6/=18 50.00% 15.0/30 225.00
Re: Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:32 am
by robbolito
Q9550-XP64, Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3185 +7/-4/=19 55.00% 16.5/30
2 Houdini DEVEL-V2 x64 8_CPU 3130 +4/-7/=19 45.00% 13.5/30
Re: Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:27 am
by robbolito
AMD-X6.x64 Blitz:10', Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1234567890
1 Houdini DEVEL-V1 x64 8_CPU 3175 ½0½½½½½1½1 5.5/10
2 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3175 ½1½½½½½0½0 4.5/10
Re: Houdini Match Results and Rating
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:55 am
by robbolito
Qi7- 960 XP.x64, Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1234567890
1 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3185 0½1½1½½½½½ 5.5/10
2 Houdini DEVEL-V2 x64 8_CPU 3185 1½0½0½½½½½ 4.5/10