Dear Anton,Anton101 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 30, 2025 8:54 pmThank you very much, Sedat, for your incredible work.
However, without detracting from the work Dorsz has done, this contradicts the metrics on the following page.
Something doesn't add up.
No offense to anyone: https://nextchessmove.com/dev-builds
Best regards!
You are welcome and nice to read your valuable comments!
On other hand,
If you are meaning regarding the test via UHO opening suite,
You've right such as SF dev improvements did not work much!
But in the Official tour (via Unique opening suite),
SF 020425 dev. improvement seems to be better...!
Otherwise I hardly doubt to be ranked in 2nd place!
By the way,
if you're going to ask my view: why SF performed worse via UHO?
It's hard to know the true but often SF team's pre Elo diagrams,
- Does not reflect much to reality...at least under SCCT's cond. !
And just a few more words about SCCT conditions,
Hyper-Threading disabled, Large-Pages disabled,
Almost daily speed benchmarks to see stability, plus
Hash-table tests done, e.g to see which is best etc.
In other words,
Instead of SF' Team Elo diagrams, I'd prefer to rely mainly on
SCCT Hardware, Tournament Conditions, Improvements etc. !
Greetings )