Hello Homayoun,
1st of all,
I like much more original chess engines!
As same words are going for SF derivatives,
Especially which futures so many options etc.
About your rest comments,
Sure I was not meaning about Stockfish 17
I was meaning about the ones, which are close
In strength to 1500 Elo - 2600 Elo
And according to my experience,
Stockfish 17 is too strong for Humans,
But if you play vs SF..it is all right! even great !!
Btw, if you play vs SF17..did you manage to win so far?)
And just to be more clear,
I am not forcing you to use/play/test SF derivatives!
You are free ...but I just tried to explain about advantages..
No more... no less...
About your other rest comments,
In some I'm aware in some not..
Like you...
Greetings )
SedatChess
Re: SedatChess
Hi Sedat
I don’t play with a strong chess engine like stock fish or obsidian or superhuman engines to win them. It’s obvious that I can’t win even a single rated game specially under blitz time controls. I only improve my chess capabilities by this practice and analysing my games after the match and learning from my mistakes. It’s very effective practice for me.
Best regards
I don’t play with a strong chess engine like stock fish or obsidian or superhuman engines to win them. It’s obvious that I can’t win even a single rated game specially under blitz time controls. I only improve my chess capabilities by this practice and analysing my games after the match and learning from my mistakes. It’s very effective practice for me.
Best regards