I ran a double round-robin tournament of the Ippo family of engines including derivates, clones, copies, etc. etc. (I really don´t care about that legal crap) as well as a few other controversial engines and it seems Tankist is stronger than the newest version of Robo I could find.
It is clear that Houdini is still the best of the bunch though...
Code: Select all
Engine Score Ho Ta Fi Iv Ip Ro Ig Fi St Cy S-B
01: Houdini 1.5a 12.5/18 ·· =1 10 1= == 0= 10 11 11 11 98,25
02: Tankist 1.7 11.5/18 =0 ·· 11 == 10 1= == 11 1= 01 96,75
03: FireBird 1.1 11.0/18 01 00 ·· == =1 1= == 01 11 11 86,00
04: IvanHoe 999947c 11.0/18 0= == == ·· 1= == 0= 1= 11 11 84,50
05: IppoLit 0.080a 10.0/18 == 01 =0 0= ·· 1= =1 =1 10 1= 83,50
06: RobboLito 0.09 10.0/18 1= 0= 0= == 0= ·· == == 11 11 78,50
07: Igorrit 0.086v9 9.5/18 01 == == 1= =0 == ·· =0 =1 =1 82,25
08: Fire 1.31 6.0/18 00 00 10 0= =0 == =1 ·· 0= 01 51,75
09: Strelka 3R 5.0/18 00 0= 00 00 01 00 =0 1= ·· 1= 34,75
10: Cyclone xTreme 3.5/18 00 10 00 00 0= 00 =0 10 0= ·· 29,75
Firebird 1.1 has Dr. Deeb´s settings. Only missing from this list was Deep Saros which I´ll include in a future tournament with longer time control and replacing Cyclone xTreme.
I understand very well that a single tournament like the above is not enough to determine ratings or anything like that but still, Tankist seemed very strong and it surprised me to see it finishing in 2nd place.
Regards.