Has anyone here found this to be useful? Is it really up-to-date by (say) PlayChess standards? They have positive reviews from van Wely and Khalifman dating from late January.
I can note that they use engine games as fodder.
As an example: Line 495, Najdorf, English Attack.Computer engines have, nowadays, become irreplaceable assistants in any serious chess analysis, yet their games are conspicuously absent from most opening books and articles. After thorough research, Chess Openings 24/7 is determined not to make that mistake, and engine games will have the same treatment as any other game. Such an unbiased approach is bound to reap instant rewards, and an example of it will be available in an upcoming article by GM Borki Predojević, whose success in a recent game came mostly as the result of an opening preparation based on Black's incredible success rate in engine games played with that opening line.
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e5 7. Nf3 Qc7 8. a4 Be7 9. Be2 O-O 10. a5 Be6 11. O-O h6 12. Nd5 Nxd5 13. exd5 Bf5 14. Nd2
Current reputation, playable for both sides.
Key Games (3 of those listed):
Houdini vs RobboLito, Internet Blitz 2013
Houdini vs Houdini, Internet Blitz 2013
Deep Saros vs Houdini, Internet 2011