OpenChess

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:06 pm**

Hello folks, I was bored last night so I thought I'd try to develope a new set of parameters to Zappa Mexico II. I want something that played like Tal on Angel Dust. So after some crazy setting and tweaking I created a super aggressive version of Zappa. It is most likely alot weaker than the default, HOWEVER, if you make a mistake, you die!
Here Stockfish is crushed in 27 moves! Let's call these setting Dissident Aggressor. Another point is that I analyzed the game with Rybka 4.0 and others and they are clueless of the dangerous and do not seem the coming attack. I may be onto something here !??

[Event "Microsoft, Blitz:10'"]
[Site "Microsoft"]
[Date "2010.06.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Zappa Mexico II"]
[Black "Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 64bit"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B85"]
[Annotator "0.77;0.52"]
[PlyCount "53"]
[TimeControl "600"]

1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5.
Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. a4 {0} Nc6 {0} 7. Be2 {0} e6 {0} 8. Be3 {0} Be7 {0} 9. O-O {0
} O-O {0} 10. f4 {0} Qc7 {0} 11. Kh1 {0} Re8 {0} 12. Bf3 {0} Bf8 {0} 13. Qd2 {0
} Rb8 {0} 14. Rad1 {0} Nd7 {0} 15. Qf2 {Both last book move 0} Nb4 {0.52/19 14}
16. f5 {(Rd2) 0.77/17 43} e5 {0.52/21 13} 17. Nde2 {0.64/16 43} Nc5 {
(b5) 0.48/20 17} 18. Ng3 {1.12/16 87} b6 {(Bd7) 0.48/21 49} 19. Nh5 {
(Qe2) 1.30/15 25} Bd7 {(Kh8) 0.44/22 17} 20. Qh4 {(Rd2) 1.77/14 41} Rec8 {
(Bc6) 0.28/18 25} 21. Be2 {(Qg3) 2.86/12 20} h6 {(Ne6) 3.43/18 23} 22. Nxg7 {
(Nf6+) 5.90/13 23} Qd8 {5.81/17 10} 23. Qg3 {6.74/13 16} Kh8 {6.38/18 14} 24.
f6 {6.74/12 0} Nc6 {(Nxa4) 7.39/18 21} 25. Qh4 {(Bh5) 8.43/13 25} Kg8 {
12.44/18 11} 26. Bxh6 {(Qxh6) 11.35/12 0} Nd4 {(d5) 15.15/17 13} 27. Bc4 {
(Bh5) 12.15/11 0} 1-0

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:21 pm**

Robert Flesher wrote:Hello folks, I was bored last night so I thought I'd try to develope a new set of parameters to Zappa Mexico II. I want something that played like Tal on Angel Dust. So after some crazy setting and tweaking I created a super aggressive version of Zappa. It is most likely alot weaker than the default, HOWEVER, if you make a mistake, you die!
Here Stockfish is crushed in 27 moves! Let's call these setting Dissident Aggressor. Another point is that I analyzed the game with Rybka 4.0 and others and they are clueless of the dangers and do not see the coming attack. I may be onto something here !??

[Event "Microsoft, Blitz:10'"]
[Site "Microsoft"]
[Date "2010.06.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Zappa Mexico II"]
[Black "Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 64bit"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B85"]
[Annotator "0.77;0.52"]
[PlyCount "53"]
[TimeControl "600"]

1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5.
Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. a4 {0} Nc6 {0} 7. Be2 {0} e6 {0} 8. Be3 {0} Be7 {0} 9. O-O {0
} O-O {0} 10. f4 {0} Qc7 {0} 11. Kh1 {0} Re8 {0} 12. Bf3 {0} Bf8 {0} 13. Qd2 {0
} Rb8 {0} 14. Rad1 {0} Nd7 {0} 15. Qf2 {Both last book move 0} Nb4 {0.52/19 14}
16. f5 {(Rd2) 0.77/17 43} e5 {0.52/21 13} 17. Nde2 {0.64/16 43} Nc5 {
(b5) 0.48/20 17} 18. Ng3 {1.12/16 87} b6 {(Bd7) 0.48/21 49} 19. Nh5 {
(Qe2) 1.30/15 25} Bd7 {(Kh8) 0.44/22 17} 20. Qh4 {(Rd2) 1.77/14 41} Rec8 {
(Bc6) 0.28/18 25} 21. Be2 {(Qg3) 2.86/12 20} h6 {(Ne6) 3.43/18 23} 22. Nxg7 {
(Nf6+) 5.90/13 23} Qd8 {5.81/17 10} 23. Qg3 {6.74/13 16} Kh8 {6.38/18 14} 24.
f6 {6.74/12 0} Nc6 {(Nxa4) 7.39/18 21} 25. Qh4 {(Bh5) 8.43/13 25} Kg8 {
12.44/18 11} 26. Bxh6 {(Qxh6) 11.35/12 0} Nd4 {(d5) 15.15/17 13} 27. Bc4 {
(Bh5) 12.15/11 0} 1-0

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:39 pm**

Robert Flesher wrote:
Robert Flesher wrote:Hello folks, I was bored last night so I thought I'd try to develope a new set of parameters to Zappa Mexico II. I want something that played like Tal on Angel Dust. So after some crazy setting and tweaking I created a super aggressive version of Zappa. It is most likely alot weaker than the default, HOWEVER, if you make a mistake, you die!
Here Stockfish is crushed in 27 moves! Let's call these setting Dissident Aggressor. Another point is that I analyzed the game with Rybka 4.0 and others and they are clueless of the dangers and do not see the coming attack. I may be onto something here !??

[Event "Microsoft, Blitz:10'"]
[Site "Microsoft"]
[Date "2010.06.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Zappa Mexico II"]
[Black "Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 64bit"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B85"]
[Annotator "0.77;0.52"]
[PlyCount "53"]
[TimeControl "600"]

1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5.
Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. a4 {0} Nc6 {0} 7. Be2 {0} e6 {0} 8. Be3 {0} Be7 {0} 9. O-O {0
} O-O {0} 10. f4 {0} Qc7 {0} 11. Kh1 {0} Re8 {0} 12. Bf3 {0} Bf8 {0} 13. Qd2 {0
} Rb8 {0} 14. Rad1 {0} Nd7 {0} 15. Qf2 {Both last book move 0} Nb4 {0.52/19 14}
16. f5 {(Rd2) 0.77/17 43} e5 {0.52/21 13} 17. Nde2 {0.64/16 43} Nc5 {
(b5) 0.48/20 17} 18. Ng3 {1.12/16 87} b6 {(Bd7) 0.48/21 49} 19. Nh5 {
(Qe2) 1.30/15 25} Bd7 {(Kh8) 0.44/22 17} 20. Qh4 {(Rd2) 1.77/14 41} Rec8 {
(Bc6) 0.28/18 25} 21. Be2 {(Qg3) 2.86/12 20} h6 {(Ne6) 3.43/18 23} 22. Nxg7 {
(Nf6+) 5.90/13 23} Qd8 {5.81/17 10} 23. Qg3 {6.74/13 16} Kh8 {6.38/18 14} 24.
f6 {6.74/12 0} Nc6 {(Nxa4) 7.39/18 21} 25. Qh4 {(Bh5) 8.43/13 25} Kg8 {
12.44/18 11} 26. Bxh6 {(Qxh6) 11.35/12 0} Nd4 {(d5) 15.15/17 13} 27. Bc4 {
(Bh5) 12.15/11 0} 1-0

quite fun, although the attack did rather play itself, while Stockfish fiddled and did absolutely nothing.

Strategy-wise the playing strength of Stockfish demonstrated by this game consists of: play out opening according to stored book, then have absolutely no clue what to do and fiddle around. 3000 ELO? Tres drole. However, if you create rating lists out of similar monsters that equally have no idea what to do, then any rating is possible, I suppose.

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:55 pm**

Chris Whittington wrote:
Robert Flesher wrote:
Robert Flesher wrote:Hello folks, I was bored last night so I thought I'd try to develope a new set of parameters to Zappa Mexico II. I want something that played like Tal on Angel Dust. So after some crazy setting and tweaking I created a super aggressive version of Zappa. It is most likely alot weaker than the default, HOWEVER, if you make a mistake, you die!
Here Stockfish is crushed in 27 moves! Let's call these setting Dissident Aggressor. Another point is that I analyzed the game with Rybka 4.0 and others and they are clueless of the dangers and do not see the coming attack. I may be onto something here !??

[Event "Microsoft, Blitz:10'"]
[Site "Microsoft"]
[Date "2010.06.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Zappa Mexico II"]
[Black "Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 64bit"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B85"]
[Annotator "0.77;0.52"]
[PlyCount "53"]
[TimeControl "600"]

1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5.
Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. a4 {0} Nc6 {0} 7. Be2 {0} e6 {0} 8. Be3 {0} Be7 {0} 9. O-O {0
} O-O {0} 10. f4 {0} Qc7 {0} 11. Kh1 {0} Re8 {0} 12. Bf3 {0} Bf8 {0} 13. Qd2 {0
} Rb8 {0} 14. Rad1 {0} Nd7 {0} 15. Qf2 {Both last book move 0} Nb4 {0.52/19 14}
16. f5 {(Rd2) 0.77/17 43} e5 {0.52/21 13} 17. Nde2 {0.64/16 43} Nc5 {
(b5) 0.48/20 17} 18. Ng3 {1.12/16 87} b6 {(Bd7) 0.48/21 49} 19. Nh5 {
(Qe2) 1.30/15 25} Bd7 {(Kh8) 0.44/22 17} 20. Qh4 {(Rd2) 1.77/14 41} Rec8 {
(Bc6) 0.28/18 25} 21. Be2 {(Qg3) 2.86/12 20} h6 {(Ne6) 3.43/18 23} 22. Nxg7 {
(Nf6+) 5.90/13 23} Qd8 {5.81/17 10} 23. Qg3 {6.74/13 16} Kh8 {6.38/18 14} 24.
f6 {6.74/12 0} Nc6 {(Nxa4) 7.39/18 21} 25. Qh4 {(Bh5) 8.43/13 25} Kg8 {
12.44/18 11} 26. Bxh6 {(Qxh6) 11.35/12 0} Nd4 {(d5) 15.15/17 13} 27. Bc4 {
(Bh5) 12.15/11 0} 1-0

quite fun, although the attack did rather play itself, while Stockfish fiddled and did absolutely nothing.

Strategy-wise the playing strength of Stockfish demonstrated by this game consists of: play out opening according to stored book, then have absolutely no clue what to do and fiddle around. 3000 ELO? Tres drole. However, if you create rating lists out of similar monsters that equally have no idea what to do, then any rating is possible, I suppose.

I agree completely! Long term planning is still an area of major improvement for engines.

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:06 pm**

These setting are very surprising, in alot of games Zappa loses and looks very stupid. But in some positions it plays amazing attacks. Again I think I am on to something here. Insanity, attack from where they won't see you coming !
[Event "Microsoft, Blitz:10'"]
[Site "Microsoft"]
[Date "2010.06.18"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Zappa Mexico II"]
[Black "Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 64bit"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C96"]
[Annotator "0.59;0.08"]
[PlyCount "103"]
[TimeControl "600"]

{Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz 0 MHz W=15.6 ply; 3,675kN/s;
BookDF12.ctg B=23.3 ply; 5,695kN/s; BookDF12.ctg} 1. e4 {0} e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0}
Nc6 {0} 3. Bb5 {0} a6 {0} 4. Ba4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5. O-O {0} Be7 {0} 6. Re1 {0} b5 {
0} 7. Bb3 {0} d6 {0} 8. c3 {0} O-O {0} 9. h3 {0} Na5 {0} 10. Bc2 {0} c5 {0} 11.
d4 {0} Nd7 {0} 12. dxc5 {0} dxc5 {0} 13. Nbd2 {0} Bb7 {0} 14. Nf1 {0} Nc4 {0}
15. N3h2 {0} Qc7 {0} 16. Ng4 {Both last book move 0} Rad8 {0.08/20 19} 17. Ng3
{0.59/15 15} Nf6 {0.00/22 19} 18. Nxf6+ {0.67/16 13} Bxf6 {0.04/21 17} 19. Qe2
{(Qf3) 0.59/16 11} g6 {(Bc8) 0.00/21 12} 20. a4 {0.71/15 13} Nd6 {
(Ra8) 0.08/21 26} 21. Bh6 {(Rd1) 0.66/14 15} Bg7 {(Rfe8) 0.12/20 12} 22. Bxg7 {
(Bg5) 1.03/16 26} Kxg7 {-0.04/17 1} 23. axb5 {(f3) 1.03/16 28} axb5 {
-0.08/24 13} 24. Qe3 {(Nf1) 0.83/16 15} f6 {(Nc4) -0.32/20 10} 25. h4 {
(Nf1) 1.06/15 14} Nc4 {(Kh8) -0.52/21 13} 26. Qc1 {1.09/16 11} h5 {
(Kh8) -0.52/22 24} 27. b3 {1.34/15 13} Na5 {(Nd6) -0.48/23 21} 28. Qe3 {
(Rd1) 1.40/14 14} Ra8 {(c4) -0.44/20 11} 29. Bd1 {(Reb1) 1.48/14 21} Rh8 {
-0.44/21 17} 30. Be2 {1.21/14 21} c4 {0.00/21 10} 31. b4 {1.13/15 14} Nb3 {
0.00/26 10} 32. Rxa8 {0.94/15 17} Bxa8 {0.00/28 12} 33. Rd1 {(Bxh5) 0.97/16 9}
Kf7 {(Bc6) 0.00/27 8} 34. Bf3 {(Bxh5) 0.97/15 10} Bc6 {(Bb7) -0.20/22 18} 35.
Qe2 {(Be2) 0.94/15 11} Qb8 {(Rh7) -0.16/23 9} 36. Kh1 {(Nf1) 0.85/15 10} Ke6 {
(Qb6) -0.16/23 12} 37. Bxh5 {(Qe3) 0.96/16 14} gxh5 {0.00/25 7} 38. Qf3 {
0.72/16 11} Kf7 {(Rd8) 0.00/26 7} 39. Nf5 {1.08/16 11} Rh7 {(Qc7) 0.00/27 10}
40. Kg1 {(Nd6+) 1.23/16 27} Qa8 {(Qc7) 0.00/25 7} 41. Qe3 {1.06/14 11} Qb8 {
(Kg8) 1.29/25 34} 42. Rd6 {2.30/15 13} Qb7 {(Qc7) 1.81/22 14} 43. Rd8 {
(Rxf6+) 2.47/13 5} Ke6 {1.45/21 6} 44. Qh3 {(Qg3) 2.47/13 0} Bd7 {
(Rd7) 4.16/20 6} 45. Qg3 {2.96/14 7} Qxe4 {5.33/23 7} 46. Qg8+ {2.96/14 0} Kxf5
{6.82/24 5} 47. Qxh7+ {2.96/14 0} Kf4 {5.93/18 0} 48. Qh6+ {3.41/15 13} Kf5 {
5.81/13 0} 49. Rxd7 {3.41/14 0} Ke6 {(Qe1+) 7.75/24 6} 50. Rd1 {
(Qg7) 3.87/14 12} Qe2 {6.78/22 4} 51. Rd8 {5.98/14 0} Qe1+ {8.48/24 4} 52. Kh2
{5.98/14 0} 1-0

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:21 pm**

Hi Robert, can we have these settings for testing!

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:25 pm**

Vael Jean-Paul wrote:Hi Robert, can we have these settings for testing!

NO!! Don't give them. Those testers will play thousands of games overnight while they sleep, never look at games, then say results 59.5-47.5 ELO 3514. End of all thought.

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:29 pm**

Vael Jean-Paul wrote:Hi Robert, can we have these settings for testing!

They will score horrible results. They are made to crush humans with huge attacking aggression. For example here is a loss, but again look at the crazy attack Zappa gets. Few humans would withstand this kind of attacking, and this was my goal.

[Event "Microsoft, Blitz:10'"]
[Site "Microsoft"]
[Date "2010.06.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Zappa Mexico II"]
[Black "Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 64bit"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B85"]
[Annotator "0.78;0.36"]
[PlyCount "129"]
[TimeControl "600"]

1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} e6 {0} 5.
Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. Be2 {0} d6 {0} 7. Be3 {0} Nf6 {0} 8. a4 {0} Be7 {0} 9. O-O {0
} O-O {0} 10. f4 {0} Qc7 {0} 11. Kh1 {0} Re8 {0} 12. Bf3 {0} Bd7 {0} 13. Nb3 {0
} b6 {0} 14. g4 {0} Bc8 {0} 15. g5 {0} Nd7 {0} 16. Bg2 {0} Bb7 {0} 17. Rf3 {0}
Nb4 {0} 18. Rh3 {0} g6 {0} 19. Qd2 {0} Bf8 {0} 20. Qf2 {0} Bg7 {0} 21. Rf1 {0}
Re7 {0} 22. Bd4 {0} e5 {0} 23. fxe5 {Both last book move 0} Bxe5 {0.36/20 18}
24. Bxe5 {(Kg1) 0.78/16 48} dxe5 {0.68/22 26} 25. Nd1 {(Nd2) 0.78/15 0} Qxc2 {
(Rf8) 0.52/23 14} 26. Qh4 {1.10/11 0} f5 {(f6) 0.68/23 12} 27. Ne3 {
(gxf6) 1.65/9 0} Qxb3 {(Qe2) -0.68/23 15} 28. Nd5 {2.75/17 46} Bxd5 {-0.72/21 1
} 29. Rxb3 {2.75/16 0} Bxb3 {-0.76/21 1} 30. exf5 {2.75/16 0} Nd5 {0.00/23 12}
31. f6 {(fxg6) 2.44/17 23} Rf7 {-0.56/23 12} 32. Qg3 {2.44/16 0} Nc5 {
-0.48/22 15} 33. Qxe5 {(a5) 2.44/15 0} Rd8 {-0.48/23 11} 34. a5 {2.58/17 26}
bxa5 {-0.32/23 13} 35. h4 {(Kg1) 2.24/17 26} a4 {-0.40/22 12} 36. h5 {
(Rf3) 2.04/16 47} gxh5 {-1.05/21 15} 37. Rf5 {(Qe2) 1.91/15 12} Nd7 {
(Ne6) -1.29/21 11} 38. Qd4 {(Qe4) 1.86/15 20} Nc7 {-1.33/23 14} 39. Ra5 {
(Bf3) 1.33/15 30} Ne6 {-2.54/18 11} 40. Qe3 {(Qb4) 0.61/14 27} h6 {
(Ndf8) -2.50/22 10} 41. Qe4 {(Bd5) -0.35/14 15} Kh8 {(Nxg5) -3.55/19 8} 42.
Rxa6 {(g6) -0.93/13 11} Nxg5 {(Ndc5) -3.67/19 9} 43. Qg6 {-0.83/14 7} Nh7 {
-3.35/22 10} 44. Rd6 {-1.43/14 16} Rxf6 {-3.55/23 8} 45. Qd3 {-1.49/15 14} Rxd6
{-3.87/22 7} 46. Qxd6 {-1.49/14 0} Nhf6 {-3.67/24 8} 47. Bh3 {-1.49/13 0} Bd5+
{-3.91/22 10} 48. Kh2 {-1.49/12 0} Rc8 {-3.95/24 11} 49. Bf5 {-1.75/13 0} Rc5 {
(Kg8) -4.04/23 10} 50. Qe7 {-1.70/14 7} Bc6 {-3.83/22 7} 51. Be6 {-1.39/14 8}
Bb5 {(Rg5) -3.75/22 8} 52. Qd8+ {(Kh3) -0.70/14 12} Kg7 {-4.12/21 9} 53. Qe7+ {
-0.84/14 5} Kg6 {-4.16/17 1} 54. Bf7+ {-0.99/14 10} Kf5 {-4.28/21 9} 55. Qe6+ {
-1.47/14 12} Kf4 {-4.44/20 7} 56. Qd6+ {-1.47/14 0} Re5 {-4.60/21 9} 57. Qd2+ {
-1.47/13 0} Kf3 {-4.60/21 7} 58. Qg2+ {-1.47/13 0} Ke3 {-4.64/16 0} 59. Qg3+ {
(Qc2) -1.48/14 10} Ke2 {-4.64/21 6} 60. Qg2+ {-1.48/14 9} Kd1 {-4.68/21 8} 61.
Qg1+ {-2.09/13 9} Kd2 {-4.80/22 13} 62. Qd4+ {-2.09/13 8} Ke2 {-4.80/21 7} 63.
Qf4 {(Bc4+) -3.21/13 7} Ng4+ {-6.02/19 5} 64. Kg1 {(Kg3) -3.32/14 4} Ndf6 {
(Rg5) -7.51/19 5} 65. Qf1+ {adjud. (Bc4+) -4.48/12 3} 0-1

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:45 pm**

Now try these settings in Zappa against Rybka 4. I saw the horrible way it played against Father who showed how ridiculous its playing strength really is. Maybe these new setting is the way to defeat Rybka 4.

Posted: **Sat Jun 19, 2010 12:42 am**

I cannot understand why, but these setting are able to win some beautifully tactical games against Stockfish! My Dissident Aggressor settings really do appear to be Tal on Angel Dust! WOW!

It seems that with some tweaks this could be a top engine ? Few others can blow Stockfish off the board like this, yet in certain positions it does and it's always with a brilliant attack! I have to stress it often loses badly , but it is always a crazy attacking game. This personality was created to crush me and other humans. This is more than I could have hoped for! Here is another beatiful win :

[Event "Microsoft, Blitz:10'"]
[Site "Microsoft"]
[Date "2010.06.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Zappa Mexico II"]
[Black "Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 64bit"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E13"]
[Annotator "0.31;0.20"]
[PlyCount "125"]
[TimeControl "600"]

{Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz 0 MHz W=14.1 ply; 3,522kN/s;
BookDF12.ctg B=21.4 ply; 5,518kN/s; BookDF12.ctg} 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0}
e6 {0} 3. Nf3 {0} b6 {0} 4. Nc3 {0} Bb7 {0} 5. Bg5 {0} Bb4 {0} 6. Nd2 {0} h6 {0
} 7. Bh4 {0} O-O {0} 8. e4 {0} Be7 {0} 9. Bg3 {0} d5 {0} 10. cxd5 {0} exd5 {0}
11. e5 {0} Nfd7 {Both last book move 0} 12. Be2 {0.31/16 37} c5 {0.20/22 27}
13. O-O {(Nf3) 0.25/17 42} cxd4 {0.40/21 17} 14. Nb5 {0.25/16 0} Nc6 {
(Nc5) 0.16/23 33} 15. Nf3 {0.31/16 34} Nc5 {(Bc5) 0.36/21 14} 16. Nfxd4 {
(Nbxd4) 0.41/16 19} Ne4 {0.20/22 17} 17. e6 {(Bf4) 0.66/16 32} Nxd4 {
(Nxg3) 0.00/20 12} 18. Nxd4 {0.61/16 28} Nxg3 {(Bc5) 0.00/23 24} 19. hxg3 {
0.78/15 0} Bc5 {0.00/24 14} 20. Bh5 {(b4) 0.78/14 0} g6 {(fxe6) 0.00/20 9} 21.
exf7+ {1.57/15 41} Kxf7 {-0.08/23 14} 22. Bg4 {(Bf3) 1.28/15 22} Re8 {
(Bxd4) 0.00/22 11} 23. b4 {(Rc1) 1.30/14 12} Bxb4 {(Bxd4) 0.00/21 13} 24. Ne6 {
1.24/13 11} Qe7 {(Qf6) 0.00/22 9} 25. Rb1 {1.70/12 8} Bd6 {(Bc5) 0.00/22 12}
26. Rb3 {(Qd2) 1.74/13 9} Kg8 {0.52/20 14} 27. Re1 {1.68/14 14} d4 {
(Kh7) 0.60/21 14} 28. Bf3 {(Qxd4) 2.43/14 7} Rac8 {(Bc8) 0.96/21 11} 29. Bxb7 {
3.35/14 10} Qxb7 {1.17/16 1} 30. Rf3 {3.35/15 18} Qh7 {(Kh7) 1.65/21 8} 31.
Qxd4 {3.58/14 10} Bf8 {(Bc5) 2.94/23 11} 32. g4 {(Qd3) 4.18/13 8} b5 {2.58/18 8
} 33. Qe4 {(Qd5) 4.01/13 7} g5 {(Rc7) 2.22/20 8} 34. Qd5 {3.90/13 7} Kh8 {
2.46/20 2} 35. Qe5+ {(Qxb5) 3.79/13 8} Bg7 {1.85/20 7} 36. Qxb5 {3.60/15 15}
Rb8 {(Re7) 2.14/20 7} 37. Qd7 {3.31/14 5} Bb2 {(Qg6) 2.10/22 7} 38. Rf7 {
(Qd5) 4.32/14 4} Qg6 {2.10/20 7} 39. Re3 {4.32/15 11} Kg8 {2.10/19 6} 40. Rf5 {
(Rff3) 3.98/15 12} Ba1 {(Bf6) 2.50/18 11} 41. Kh2 {4.42/13 5} Bf6 {3.91/18 7}
42. Qc6 {(Qd5) 4.61/13 4} Rbc8 {(Bg7) 3.63/20 5} 43. Qd5 {4.67/12 7} Kh8 {
3.75/22 6} 44. Qd7 {(Ref3) 4.67/12 0} Bb2 {(Ba1) 4.44/20 11} 45. a3 {
(f4) 5.22/12 3} a5 {(Bf6) 3.95/18 8} 46. a4 {(Rb3) 5.10/12 4} Kg8 {
(Rb8) 4.52/18 8} 47. Qd5 {(Nxg5) 4.73/12 4} Kh8 {4.16/19 7} 48. Qd7 {
(Rxg5) 5.01/13 4} Kg8 {(Rb8) 0.00/32 4} 49. Qd5 {(Nxg5) 4.73/13 5} Kh8 {
0.00/37 4} 50. Rxg5 {4.70/14 12} hxg5 {4.24/15 0} 51. Rh3+ {4.70/13 7} Kg8 {
4.32/16 0} 52. Nxg5+ {4.42/14 6} Kg7 {(Kf8) 5.01/20 6} 53. Qb7+ {6.49/13 0} Kg8
{5.25/20 5} 54. Qb3+ {6.49/13 6} Kf8 {5.25/20 5} 55. Rf3+ {6.49/12 0} Bf6 {
5.61/20 5} 56. Rxf6+ {6.49/12 0} Qxf6 {5.49/15 0} 57. Nh7+ {6.49/12 0} Kg7 {
5.81/19 7} 58. Nxf6 {6.49/12 0} Kxf6 {5.69/12 0} 59. f4 {(Qb6+) 6.49/12 0} Re7
{(Kg7) 6.06/18 6} 60. g5+ {(Qb6+) 8.39/12 3} Kg7 {8.20/18 6} 61. f5 {
(Qd5) 8.39/12 0} Rd7 {(Rec7) 9.85/19 5} 62. f6+ {8.12/8 0} Kg6 {14.26/22 5} 63.
Qb1+ {9.35/12 2} 1-0

OpenChess

New Zappa settings, dead Stockfish!

New Zappa settings, dead Stockfish!

corrected grammar! LOL

Re: corrected grammar! LOL

Re: corrected grammar! LOL

Another win! against Stockfish!

Re: New Zappa settings, dead Stockfish!

Re: New Zappa settings, dead Stockfish!

Re: New Zappa settings, dead Stockfish!

Re: New Zappa settings, dead Stockfish!

Re: New Zappa settings, dead Stockfish!