OpenChess

I am thinking about migrating our pgn viewer to chesstempo's recently published version: http://chesstempo.com/pgn-viewer.html . For one, it supports variations. It might be a bit difficult to achieve the same compact formatting we have at the moment, though. I haven't done any experiments. Any opinions?

Jeremy Bernstein wrote:I am thinking about migrating our pgn viewer to chesstempo's recently published version: http://chesstempo.com/pgn-viewer.html . For one, it supports variations. It might be a bit difficult to achieve the same compact formatting we have at the moment, though. I haven't done any experiments. Any opinions?

I tend to use this pgn viewer quite a bit -- so long all the features are retained and nothing breaks, most of us will be happy.

Something I dislike is that it takes a while to load, and in that time my browser seems to freeze.

I'd rather keep the one we have and propose new features such as variations, as I like the look and feel of what we have better.